The 130th Annual Meeting of APHA

4184.0: Tuesday, November 12, 2002 - 3:00 PM

Abstract #47207

Restricted opportunities at work, a comparison of mental and physical disabilities in the National Health Interview Disability Supplement

Mary Rae, MS1, Toni Alterman, PhD2, Martin Petersen, PhD3, James Grosch, PhD2, and Neil Russell, PhD4. (1) Epidemiology, University of Cincinnati, 6301 E. Breezewood Drive, Columbia, MO 65202, (2) NIOSH, CDC, 4676 Columbia Parkway, Cincinnati, OH 45226, 513-841-4210, raemn@email.uc.edu, (3) National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, 4676 Columbia Parkway, Cincinnati, OH 45226, (4) Bureau of Transportation Statistics, United States Department of Transportation, 400 Seventh Street, Washington, DC 20590

Perceptions of restricted opportunities in the workplace were examined for those reporting conditions due to mental vs. physical disabilities using data from the National Health Interview Survey Disability Supplement (NHIS-D), 1994-1995. Logistic regression was used to examine more subtle forms of perceived discrimination among the disabled working population. Restricted opportunities were defined as being denied: a promotion, transfer, or access to training because of a disability. Results showed that 9.5% of this population reported being denied at least one of these opportunities because of their disability. When the primary cause of work limitation was examined, it was found that those who had a mental disability as their primary cause of work limitation were six times more likely to report encountering restricted opportunities in the workplace than those with a physical disability. When both primary and secondary conditions were included in the model, it was found that those with only mental disabilities were almost six times more likely to report encountering restricted opportunities; those with both mental and physical disabilities were almost eight times more likely, compared to those who only had physical disabilities. This current study is limited by reliance on self-reported data. Future studies comparing self-report responses to actual personnel records may be useful. Additional results and implications for disabled workers will be discussed.

Learning Objectives:

Keywords: Disability Studies, Workforce

Presenting author's disclosure statement:
I do not have any significant financial interest/arrangement or affiliation with any organization/institution whose products or services are being discussed in this session.

Employment of People with Disabilities

The 130th Annual Meeting of APHA