Back to Annual Meeting

Back to Annual Meeting

Abstract #159185

• Audio (mp3) recording
• Slides (pdf) or Handout

Victoria Parker, DBA, Health Policy and Managemetn, Boston University School of Public Health, 715 Albany Street, T3-W, Boston, MA 02118, 617.638.5044, vaparker@bu.edu, Jack Clark, PhD, Health Policy and Management, Boston University School of Public Health, 715 Albany Street, T3-W, Boston, MA 02118, Tracy Battaglia, MD, MPH, Associate Professor, Boston University School of Medicine, 720 Harrision Avenue, Boston, MA 02118, Elizabeth Calhoun, PhD, School of Public Health, Division of Health Policy and Administration, University of Illinois, Chicago, 1603 W. Taylor Street, Room 758, Chicago, IL 60612-4310, Ronald Epstein, MD, Department of Family Medicine, University of Rochester Medical Center, 1381 South Avenue, Rochester, NY 14620, and Karen Freund, MD, MPH, Director, BU Center of Excellence in Women's Health, Chief, Women's Health Unit, Boston Medical Center, 720 Harrison Avenue, Suite 1108, Boston, MA 02118.

Problem:

Patient navigation—the process of linking patients to complex cancer services, circumventing barriers, organizing services, and tracking patients through treatment—holds promise for reducing disparities in cancer outcomes. Navigation programs have proliferated, but the parameters of navigators' roles are not well defined, limiting understanding of how their performances vary and how specific components contribute to optimal patient outcomes. We developed an instrument for measuring navigators' work.

Methods:

Navigators in the nine participating sites of the NCI-funded Patient Navigator Research Program (PNRP) support the care of patients with abnormal screening tests for breast, cervical, colorectal, or prostate cancer. We chose three representative sites for close, qualitative study, shadowing and interviewing navigators as they worked. Detailed field notes were aggregated and compared across all navigators, sites, and cancers to develop a taxonomy of navigator activities.

Results:

The taxonomy defines two dimensions: tasks and network contacts. Tasks include scheduling tests and appointments, speaking to physicians to support care, identifying community supports, and arranging for services. Network contacts include the parties involved in accomplishing and supporting care, such as patients, providers, administrative staff, and social service agencies. The taxonomy informed a structured, comprehensive instrument for observing the work of navigators.

Conclusions:

We have developed an instrument to be applied in the remaining PNRP sites and Avon Foundation-supported programs that serve women with breast cancer. It should prove to be sensitive to the diverse settings in which navigators work and enable systematic description of variation in what navigators do for use in outcomes studies.

Learning Objectives:

• Describe how patient navigators might improve timely treatment and care for cancer patients.
• Identify a taxonomy of navigator actions and network connections that constitute their work.
• Discuss how measures of navigators’ activities may be used to characterize the processes patient navigation programs.

Keywords: Access to Care, Research

Presenting author's disclosure statement:

Any relevant financial relationships? No
Any institutionally-contracted trials related to this submission?

I agree to comply with the American Public Health Association Conflict of Interest and Commercial Support Guidelines, and to disclose to the participants any off-label or experimental uses of a commercial product or service discussed in my presentation.

• Audio (mp3) recording
• Slides (pdf) or Handout