Back to Annual Meeting

Back to Annual Meeting

Abstract #163757

Mesfin S. Mulatu, PhD, MPH, Center for Community Prevention and Treatment Research, The MayaTech Corporation, 2751 Buford Highway, N.E., Suite 202, Atlanta, GA 30324, 404-264-2644, mmulatu@mayatech.com, Jamie F. Chriqui, PhD, MHS, Institute for Health Research and Policy, University of Illinois at Chicago, 1747 West Roosevelt Road, Room 558, M/C 275, Chicago, IL 60608, and Duane C. McBride, PhD, Behavioral Science Department, Andrews University, Nethery Hall #123E, Andrews University, Berrien Springs, MI 49104.

Background: Substance abuse treatment program client outcomes are affected by a number of factors, including the degree to which ancillary and transitional assistance services are provided to patients who often lack access to these services. We examined facility-level correlates of ancillary and transitional assistance services among substance abuse treatment providers.

Method: Facility level data were obtained from the 2004 National Survey of Substance Abuse Treatment Services (N-SSATS) for programs primarily focusing on substance abuse treatment and that provided regular and intensive outpatient services to adults (n=4,949).Logistic regression analysis was used to determine if the facility's ownership, size, payment assistance, Medicaid acceptance, and funding support are associated with the offering of several ancillary and transitional services.

Results: Facilities that were owned by non-profit organizations or government agencies, that received local, state or federal earmarks, that offered payment assistance and that accepted Medicaid payments were significantly more likely to provide social services, housing, child care, transportation assistance, and HIV/AIDS educational services. In addition, non-profit or government owned facilities, those that received earmarks, and those that offered payment assistance were more likely to provide employment assistance and case management services to their clients. Size of the facility was positively associated with domestic violence services but remains largely unrelated to offerings of other ancillary and transitional services.

Conclusion: The provision of the ancillary and transitional assistance services are significantly associated with facility ownership, funding, and reimbursement mechanisms. These factors are critical to ensuring access to needed services particularly among disadvantaged communities.

Learning Objectives:

• Identify the facility level factors that are correlated with offering of ancillary and transitional assistance services among substance abuse treatment providers.
• Discuss the policy implications of the relationship between ownership, funding, and reimbursement mechanisms in addressing disparities to access to ancillary and transitional support assistance

Keywords: Substance Abuse Treatment,

Presenting author's disclosure statement:

Any relevant financial relationships? No
Any institutionally-contracted trials related to this submission?

I agree to comply with the American Public Health Association Conflict of Interest and Commercial Support Guidelines, and to disclose to the participants any off-label or experimental uses of a commercial product or service discussed in my presentation.