In this presentation, we will describe the “Neighborhoods Working in Partnership: Building Capacity for Policy Change” program, being conducted by the Detroit Community-Academic Urban Research Center (URC) in partnership with PolicyLink. The goals are to: strengthen policy advocacy skills within local neighborhoods; extend community voices into the policy making arena; and have an impact, at multiple levels, on policies aimed at creating healthy neighborhoods. We will describe the two-step process we undertook to: 1) strengthen the capacity of URC partners and other individuals to train community members to engage in public health advocacy; and 2) enhance the capacity of adult and youth community residents to conduct effective public health advocacy. Our methods included a 2-day Train-the-Trainers workshop conducted by PolicyLink in which we had over fifty participants. After the workshops, thirteen community and academic trainers carried out 4-session workshops in 7 neighborhoods in Detroit with approximately 175 residents participating. We will present the methods used to evaluate the training workshops (e.g., knowledge pre-assessment, satisfaction questionnaire, post-assessment). We will discuss findings and lessons learned and implications for engaging community members in capacity building models aimed at promoting public health advocacy to effect structural change
Learning Objectives:
1. Discuss the rationale for involving community residents in public health advocacy aimed at structural change.
2. Describe the two-step process used by the “Neighborhoods Working in Partnership” program to strengthen the capacity and skills of community members to conduct effective public health advocacy.
3. List the data collection methods used to evaluate the training workshops conducted as part of the “Neighborhoods Working in Partnership” program.
4. Articulate the findings, lessons learned and implications for engaging community members in capacity building models aimed at promoting public health advocacy to effect structural change
Qualified on the content I am responsible for because: I am the Principal Investigator for the program discussed in the abstract and I have no conflict of interest.
Any relevant financial relationships? No
I agree to comply with the American Public Health Association Conflict of Interest and Commercial Support Guidelines, and to disclose to the participants any off-label or experimental uses of a commercial product or service discussed in my presentation.
See more of: Community Health Planning and Policy Development
![[ Visit Client Website ]](images/banner.gif)