Methods:7434 non smokers, selected by a stratified cluster random sampling method, participated in a telephone survey. Hierarchical logistic regression were conducting by sex, age, education, occupation and marital status at the fist step,living area, anti-smoking knowledge and attitude at the second step,and the household smoking restriction at the final step.
Results:27% of non-smoking adults were exposure to household secondhand smoke. After controlling demographic variables, the rural and mountain area were higher household secondhand smoke than urban area (OR=1.43,CI=1.22~1.69;OR=1.53,CI=1.14~2.05).The higher anti-smoking knowledge and attitude were less to exposure household secondhand smoke (OR=0.94,CI=0.89~0.98;OR=0.88, CI=0.86~0.9). No smoke free restriction families were higher second-hand smoke exposure than smoke free restriction (OR=12.17,CI=9.59~15.44).
Conclusion:The findings support the evidence that smoking restriction is an effective strategy for reducing secondhand smoke exposure. We suggest that tobacco control programs should consider to enhance the household smoking restriction policy in the future.
Learning Objectives:
To examine the effects of the household smoking restriction related to family exposure of secondhand smoke.
Qualified on the content I am responsible for because: I am a student of the Department of Public Health Fu-Jen Catholic University, Taiwan
Any relevant financial relationships? No
I agree to comply with the American Public Health Association Conflict of Interest and Commercial Support Guidelines, and to disclose to the participants any off-label or experimental uses of a commercial product or service discussed in my presentation.
See more of: Alcohol, Tobacco, and Other Drugs
![[ Visit Client Website ]](images/banner.gif)