Methods: 369 African-American men and women aged 50 and above were randomized to one of the three interventions or a control arm. A health educator conducted educational sessions. “Reducing out-of-pocket costs” consisted of reimbursement of expenses up to $500. We assessed baseline and post intervention data on KABs through questionnaires and assessed screening outcomes 6 months after the intervention.
Results: The small group educational intervention resulted in the greatest improvement in KAB and was associated with the highest screening rates post-intervention (p= 0.039 compared to the control cohort). However, even in this group, only about 40% of participants were screened 6 months after the intervention. Persons in the “Reduced out-of-pocket costs” group were no more likely to be screened than the controls (about 20%).
Conclusions: The small group milieu is conducive to both learning and behavior change. Rates of completed screening were surprisingly low post-intervention. Financial barriers may not be the greatest obstacle to screening for colorectal cancer. Additional research into approaches to increasing colorectal cancer screening among African Americans is warranted.
Learning Objectives:
1. Describe the disparity in colorectal cancer mortality and screening rates in African-Americans as compared to white Americans
2. List 3 approaches to increasing screening for colorectal cancer among African Americans
3. Identify the most and least effective of the three approaches.
Keywords: Cancer Screening, Health Disparities
Qualified on the content I am responsible for because: I designed this project and helped analyze results
Any relevant financial relationships? No
I agree to comply with the American Public Health Association Conflict of Interest and Commercial Support Guidelines, and to disclose to the participants any off-label or experimental uses of a commercial product or service discussed in my presentation.
See more of: Epidemiology
![[ Visit Client Website ]](images/banner.gif)