We hold informal but structured “círculos de acción,” reflexive dialogues that begin with community insider-outsiders (those who work but do not necessarily live in the community of interest) and extend in subsequent dialogues to community insiders (those who do live in the community of interest). Participants from the former are asked to invite a peer to successive dialogues, an effort that stems from the premise that repeated iterations begin to permeate deeper into the community. Using these methods, we argue that allowing community members to define themselves and their issues of interest is necessary for initiating true community-based collaboration. We present the application of these methods in two case studies: (1) Santa Ana, CA and (2) a community health assessment in Valencia, a neighborhood of Fullerton, California.
Learning Objectives:
Describe advocacy strategies for community-initiated and community-based participatory actions.
Identify sources of imbalance in setting community research agendas.
Define new ways of approaching community-based research, including círculos de acción.
Keywords: Community-Based Partnership, Community Health
Qualified on the content I am responsible for because: I am a graduate student working with the Community Knowledge Project and in developing qualitative methods for community-based health projects.
Any relevant financial relationships? No
I agree to comply with the American Public Health Association Conflict of Interest and Commercial Support Guidelines, and to disclose to the participants any off-label or experimental uses of a commercial product or service discussed in my presentation.
![[ Visit Client Website ]](images/banner.gif)