Methods: (a) Secondary data analyses of the National Health Interview Survey 2005/2006 (NHIS), (b) rapid evidence review of the literature, involving MEDLINE, CINAHL, PUBMED, PSYCINFO (1996-2007), (c) Nexis UK media search for stories at the intersection of dementia and homelessness, immigrant status and poverty in US and UK newspapers since 1996.
Results: The merged dataset included 159 individuals who self- or proxy identified as having dementia. Around 5% had experienced homelessness. The rapid evidence review produced 48 publications with virtually no intervention studies. US media reports focused primarily on loss of services for illegal immigrants, drug benefit coverage, caregiver strains. UK media discussed economic burden, community support, abuse in nursing care, and dignity in the care of impoverished older adults with dementia.
Conclusion. Dementia care for socially marginalised groups is a highly under-researched area. The evidence base is lacking for culturally sensitive care environments. Interventions are critically lacking that consider the compound needs of this heterogeneous clinical population.
Learning Objectives:
To identify evidence gaps for dementia care provision at the intersection of factors of social marginalisation and health needs
To examine media-based discourses focusing on social marginalisation and dementia
To determine research and intervention foci at the intersection of social marginalisation and dementia care
Keywords: Dementia, Social Inequalities
Qualified on the content I am responsible for because: I have conducted the work as a public health researcher. I don't have any financial claims or interests in conjunction with the study.
Any relevant financial relationships? No
I agree to comply with the American Public Health Association Conflict of Interest and Commercial Support Guidelines, and to disclose to the participants any off-label or experimental uses of a commercial product or service discussed in my presentation.
![[ Visit Client Website ]](images/banner.gif)