186336 Predictors of condom use among repeat HIV-negative testing men who have sex with men

Monday, October 27, 2008

Carol L. Sipan, RN, MPH , San Diego State University, Graduate School of Public Health, San Diego, CA
Melbourne F. Hovell, PhD, MPH , San Diego State University, San Diego State University, San Diego, CA
Elaine Blumberg, MA , San Diego State University, Graduate School of Public Health, San Diego, CA
Norma Kelley, BS , San Diego State University, Graduate School of Public Health, San Diego, CA
Michele Ginsberg, MD , Community Epidemiology, Health & Human Services Agency, County of San Diego, San Diego, CA
Ming Ji, PhD , San Diego State University, Graduate School of Public Health, San Diego, CA
Raechel D. Tejidor, MPH , Infectious Disease Clinical Research Program, Naval Medical Center San Diego, San Diego, CA
Alicia Vera, MPH , Division of International Health and Cross-cultural Medicine, University of California, San Diego, San Diego, CA
C. Richard Hofstetter , Political Science & Graduate School of Public Health, San Diego State University, San Diego, CA
Background: Consistent condom use for anal sex among men who have sex with men (MSM) is critical for meeting CDC's objective of reducing new infections by 50%. This study examined HIV-related risk behaviors and explored predictors of condom use in a sample of males participating in the evaluation of an intervention to reduce HIV infection risk among high-risk, HIV-negative repeat testers in San Diego. Methods: Baseline data for a sub-sample of 85 White (69.4%) and Hispanic males reporting anal sex with male partners in the previous 12 months were analyzed using the Behavioral Ecological Model (BEM; Hovell et al). The BEM hypothesizes that condom use is predicted by multiple behavioral influences in the social and physical environments such as modeling, reinforcement, punishment, and cues to enact behaviors; individuals exposed to higher densities of behavioral influences supportive of condom use would have higher rates of condom use. A sequential multiple regression of four blocks (demographics, sexual practices, condom negotiation, and peer influence) was used to test the significance of 8 independent predictors of condom use. Results: The final regression model accounted for 62.9% of the explained variance in 3-month condom use for MSM anal intercourse, F (8,76) = 18.80, p < .001. The variables that contributed significantly were: the number of times had anal sex (p<.001), condom negotiation (p<.01) and peer influence for condom use (p<.01). Conclusions: Results provide support for the BEM and evidence for extending prevention activities beyond education to establishing skills and engineering peer support for condom use.

Learning Objectives:
1. Describe an HIV-negative repeat testing population of MSM in San Diego 2. Identify the strengths of a behavioral ecological model when assessing sources of risk 3. Recognize the importance of the social environment for achieving increases in condom use.

Keywords: Condom Use, Behavioral Research

Presenting author's disclosure statement:

Qualified on the content I am responsible for because: I am a Registered Nurse and hold a Masters Degree in Public Health from San Diego State University (1986). I am a Senior Research Associate at the Center for Behavioral Epidemiology and Community Health (CBEACH) and an Adjunct Research Professor at the GSPH, SDSU. I am currently working on my PhD in Behavioral Science through the Joint Doctoral Program of UCSD/SDSU. I have served on the San Diego County Community HIV Prevention Planning Board since 1997, and served on the California HIV Planning Group from 1995-2000. I have been involved in public health research for over 21 years, have coordinated 10 HIV studies (including the one from which the current presentation is derived) and 2 TB studies, and have co-authored a number of papers in peer-reviewed scientific journals. My areas of expertise include HIV prevention, tuberculosis, perinatal health, violence, and occupational health risks in Latino populations.
Any relevant financial relationships? No

I agree to comply with the American Public Health Association Conflict of Interest and Commercial Support Guidelines, and to disclose to the participants any off-label or experimental uses of a commercial product or service discussed in my presentation.