Methods: A randomized control trial of 131 participants assigned to either VBRT or the control condition. Both receive points for attendance, while VBRT participants receive additional points for engaging in drug and alcohol abstinence, and healthy/pro-social behaviors. Assessments conducted at baseline and 7, 9 and 12-month follow-up.
Results: Preliminary analysis shows VRBT participants were 42% more likely to test negative for amphetamines/methamphetamines, alcohol, cocaine and PCP compared to control [OR=1.42 (95%CI=1.22-1.65)]. VBRT participants achieved a higher proportion of clean UA samples (µVBRT=60%) than control (µctrl=51%; t(125)=1.86,p=.065 n.s. trend); and achieved a higher Treatment Effectiveness Score [µVBRT=31.4 (24.4)] than control (µctrl=23.0(20.8); t(125)=2.09, p=.04). Participants in the VRBT condition engaged in more targeted behaviors [µVBRT=36.7(28.4)] than those in the control condition (µctrl=20.5 (18.9), t(125)=2.11, p=.037).
Conclusions/Implications: These preliminary findings support the hypothesis that VBRT can significantly reduce substance use, moving participants toward lower HIV risk behaviors.
Learning Objectives:
Analyze the effectiveness of VBRT among homeless, substance-dependent MSM.
Keywords: Substance Abuse, Gay
Qualified on the content I am responsible for because: Study Coordinator VIPS Study, MPH UCLA School of Public Health 2007
Any relevant financial relationships? No
I agree to comply with the American Public Health Association Conflict of Interest and Commercial Support Guidelines, and to disclose to the participants any off-label or experimental uses of a commercial product or service discussed in my presentation.
See more of: Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender Caucus of Public Health Workers
![[ Visit Client Website ]](images/banner.gif)