Methods: Local health programs submit data to a central database of client screenings. We analyzed program outcomes from this database.
Results: Of 16,143 people screened for CRC by any method, 7,863 (49%) were minority race or ethnicity; 11,071 (69%) were women. Of 8,316 guaiac-based FOBTs, 7% were positive. For those who were un- or under-insured and low income (usually <250% FPG), and with and without symptoms or family history, the program paid for 146 sigmoidoscopies and 12,729 colonoscopies. On the colonoscopies, CRC was diagnosed on 146 (1.1%), high grade dysplasia on 50 (0.4%), and other adenoma(s) were found on 2,787 (22%).
Conclusion: With sufficient resources, a public health program for CRC screening can be acceptable and successful. Colonoscopy in our underserved population both diagnosed cancers and prevented CRC through polypectomy. Challenges include getting men into screening, and managing and paying for cancer treatment and for complications.
Learning Objectives:
1. List two goals of the Maryland Cancer Program
2. List three organizing principles of the Maryland statewide program
3. Describe the main outcomes of the Maryland program
Keywords: Cancer Screening, Cancer
Qualified on the content I am responsible for because: I am the Medical Director of the Center for Cancer Surveillance and Control
Any relevant financial relationships? No
I agree to comply with the American Public Health Association Conflict of Interest and Commercial Support Guidelines, and to disclose to the participants any off-label or experimental uses of a commercial product or service discussed in my presentation.
See more of: Medical Care
![[ Visit Client Website ]](images/banner.gif)