220272 “Impact” in Health Impact Assessments: Effectiveness of HIAs as a Decision-Making Tool

Tuesday, November 9, 2010 : 9:15 AM - 9:30 AM

Arthur M. Wendel, MD, MPH , Healthy Community Design Initiative, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA
Aaron Wernham, MD, MS , Director, Health Impact Project, Pew Charitable Trusts, Washington, DC
Bethany Rogerson, MPH , Health Impact Project, Pew Charitable Trusts, Washington, DC
Andrew L. Dannenberg, MD, MPH , Division of Emergency and Environmental Health Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA
Keshia Pollack, PhD, MPH , Department of Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD
Gregory Tung, MPH , Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD
Candace Rutt, PhD , Division of Nutrition and Physical Activity, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA
James E. Dills, MPH MUP , Division of Nutrition and Physical Activity, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA
Saqi Maleque, MSPH , Health Impact Project, Pew Charitable Trusts, Washington, DC
Background: Health impact assessment (HIA) is a valuable tool that helps decision-makers in non-health sectors integrate relevant health information into the assessment and planning of proposed projects, programs, or policies. Despite nearly ten years of experience with HIA in the U.S., information about the impact that HIAs have had on the decisions they address is scarce. Methods: HIA characteristics and outcomes were defined through review of HIA documents and a survey of practitioners. We This was used to developed an evaluation framework for HIA that accounts for the diverse experiences that HIA practitioners reported, and allows for a broad range of definitions of success. Results: By January 2010, 56 U.S. HIAs were identified. Practitioners identified a range of potential mechanisms through which HIA could be “successful.” HIA practitioners commonly cited decision-maker support and community involvement as important. The diverse range of HIA practices creates challenges for evaluation. However, some common characteristics of effective HIAs were identified through this survey, such as the need for HIA to be timely and to involve decision-makers early and throughout the HIA process. We will present a series of case studies based on this research that highlight the range of potential applications of HIA across multiple sectors and levels of government, as well as the outcomes of HIAs and the factors practitioners identify as important contributors to effectiveness.

Learning Areas:
Conduct evaluation related to programs, research, and other areas of practice
Public health or related laws, regulations, standards, or guidelines
Public health or related organizational policy, standards, or other guidelines
Public health or related public policy

Learning Objectives:
•Develop strategies for monitoring and evaluating health impact assessments. •Provide examples of effective health impact assessments.

Keywords: Policy/Policy Development, Evaluation

Presenting author's disclosure statement:

Qualified on the content I am responsible for because: I am qualified to be an abstract Author on the content I am responsible for because I am spearheading an effort designed to promote the use of health impact assessments and support the growth of the field in the United States.
Any relevant financial relationships? No

I agree to comply with the American Public Health Association Conflict of Interest and Commercial Support Guidelines, and to disclose to the participants any off-label or experimental uses of a commercial product or service discussed in my presentation.