238842 Keeping veterans smoking: How the tobacco industry used front groups to lobby Congress to mandate smoking lounges in veterans' facilities

Tuesday, November 1, 2011: 4:45 PM

Naphtali Offen, BS , Social & Behavioral Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
Elizabeth Smith, PhD , Social & Behavioral Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
Ruth Malone, RN, PhD, FAAN , Social & Behavioral Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
When, in the late 1980s, the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) sought to disallow smoking and tobacco sales in all VA facilities, the tobacco industry mobilized to prevent what it feared might lead to a service-wide smoking ban. It hired consultants to create a "grass roots coalition" of veterans to oppose the policy and allow the industry to play a less visible role. Arguing that it would be unpatriotic to deny veterans one of the "freedoms" they had fought for, while dismissing tobacco's deadliness, veterans' service organizations (VSOs) and industry lobbyists successfully influenced Congress to pass a law requiring every VA facility to provide an indoor smoking lounge. Civilian public health advocates should collaborate with VSOs and military public health advocates to expose the industry's behind-the-scenes manipulation, reframe the debate, and repeal the law.

Learning Areas:
Public health or related laws, regulations, standards, or guidelines
Public health or related organizational policy, standards, or other guidelines
Public health or related public policy

Learning Objectives:
1. Explain how the tobacco industry created a front group of veterans to lobby for a law that made smoking lounges mandatory in all facilities of the Department of Veterans Affairs. Discuss how tobacco state Congress members promoted tobacco industry arguments that smoking was a personal right.

Keywords: Tobacco Legislation, Tobacco Control

Presenting author's disclosure statement:

Qualified on the content I am responsible for because: I am lead author of a paper on the subject in process
Any relevant financial relationships? No

I agree to comply with the American Public Health Association Conflict of Interest and Commercial Support Guidelines, and to disclose to the participants any off-label or experimental uses of a commercial product or service discussed in my presentation.