240131 Physicians' Knowledge of and Compliance with Guidelines An Exploratory Study in Cardiovascular Diseases

Tuesday, November 1, 2011: 10:50 AM

Ute Karbach , Institute of medical Sociology, Health Services Research and Rehabilitation Science, Faculty of Human and Faculty of Medicine, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
Ingrid Schubert , PMV forschungsgruppe, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
Nicole Ernstmann , Faculty of Human Science and Faculty of Medicine, University of Cologne, Institute for Medical Sociology, Health Services Research and Rehabilitation Science, Cologne, Germany
Holger Pfaff , Faculty of Human Science and Faculty of Medicine, University of Cologne, Institute for Medical Sociology, Health Services Research and Rehabilitation Science, Cologne, Germany
Hans Wilhelm Höpp , Department III for Internal Medicine, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
Background: Guidelines are one of the means by which health care organiz- ations try to improve health care and lower its cost. Studies have shown, how- ever, that guidelines are still not being adequately implemented. In this ex- ploratory study, we examine the link between physi-cians' knowledge of and compliance with guidelines: specifically, guidelines for the treatment of three cardiovascular diseases (arterial hypertension, heart failure and chronic coron- ary heart disease [CHD]) in primary care. Methods: We assessed primary care physicians' knowledge of the guide-lines with a representative postal survey, using a questionnaire about the treatment of cardiovascular diseases (2500 questionnaires sent). We assessed the re- sponding physicians' compliance with the guidelines by analyzing patient data from a sample of 30 of them for various indicators of compliance. Of these 30 physicians, 15 met our operation-al criteria for adequate knowledge of the guidelines, and 15 did not. Results: 437 (40%) of the physicians knew the guidelines adequately. Phys- icians answered questions about chronic CHD in accordance with the guide- lines more often than they did questions about arterial hypertension (74% ver- sus 11%). Our exploratory analysis of guideline compliance revealed that phys- icians who knew the guidelines adequately performed no differently than phys- icians who did not with respect to 12 of the 16 compliance indicators. As for the remaining 4 compliance indicators, it turned out, surprisingly, that phys- icians who did not know the guidelines adequately performed significantly better than those who did. Conclusion: These preliminary findings imply that physicians' know- ledge of guidelines does not in itself lead to better guideline implementation. Further studies are needed to address this important issue.

Learning Areas:
Public health or related organizational policy, standards, or other guidelines

Learning Objectives:
1. Differentiate between Physicians’ knowledge of and compliance with guidelines. 2. List four or more indicators for evaluation of physicians’ adherence to guidelines. 3. Discuss further determinants of Physicians’ compliance with guidelines.

Presenting author's disclosure statement:

Qualified on the content I am responsible for because: I am qualified to present because I oversee the project.
Any relevant financial relationships? No

I agree to comply with the American Public Health Association Conflict of Interest and Commercial Support Guidelines, and to disclose to the participants any off-label or experimental uses of a commercial product or service discussed in my presentation.