243932 Client demographics and service characteristics of California Title X and non-Title X family planning providers

Monday, October 31, 2011: 10:50 AM

Heike Thiel de Bocanegra, PhD, MPH , Bixby Center for Global Reproductive Health, University of California, San Francisco, Sacramento, CA
Fran Maguire , Bixby Center for Global Reproductive Health, University of California, San Francisco, Sacramento, CA
Maryjane Puffer, BSN, MPA , Clinical and Community Health Programs Division, California Family Health Council, Los Angeles, CA
Kathryn J. Horsley, DrPH , Clinical and Community Health Programs Division, California Family Health Council, Inc., Berkeley, CA
Claire Brindis, DrPH , Philip R. Lee Institute for Health Policy Studies, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
The national Title X family planning program is a critical element in the provision of high quality reproductive healthcare and contraceptive services to U.S. women and men. In California, all Title X clinics are enrolled in Family PACT, the state's Medicaid family planning waiver program. We analyzed Family PACT provider and client enrollment databases and conducted a survey of 1,070 family planning providers in California to describe how Title X clinics differ from non-Title X public and private clinics. On average, clinics that have received Title X funding for four or more years provide services to three times more clients a year than non-Title X clinics (3,489 vs. 1,073). Non-Title X public clinics are more likely to be in rural areas. Clients at Title X funded clinics were on average younger and had a smaller family size and lower parity than those at non-Title X funded clinics. Private providers were more likely to serve Latino patients and had the highest proportions of male clients. Compared to non-Title X providers, Title X clinics were significantly more likely to have expanded clinic hours (70% vs. 46%), interpreter services (52% vs 23%), electronic health records (30% vs 20%) , on-site services and outreach to target groups such as teens or migrant workers. Even when core funding for clinical services is provided, Title X funding is critical to maximize clinic efficiency, leverage existing provider networks, and expand them to reach the greatest proportion of patients in need while maintaining the highest quality of care.

Learning Areas:
Administration, management, leadership
Conduct evaluation related to programs, research, and other areas of practice
Provision of health care to the public

Learning Objectives:
1. Participants will identify client demographics and service delivery components of reproductive health services in California 2. Participants will identify key differences of California reproductive health service providers between those that receive Title X funding with those that do not 3. Participants will identify significant differences in clinic structure and service delivery by provider types.

Keywords: Access and Services, Family Planning

Presenting author's disclosure statement:

Qualified on the content I am responsible for because: direct the evaluation of California's family planning program and have been involved in public health for over 15 years
Any relevant financial relationships? No

I agree to comply with the American Public Health Association Conflict of Interest and Commercial Support Guidelines, and to disclose to the participants any off-label or experimental uses of a commercial product or service discussed in my presentation.