249516 Informal caregiving and health status in the United States from the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System: Effect modification by rurality

Wednesday, November 2, 2011: 1:24 PM

Steven A. Cohen, DrPH, MPH , Department of Public Health and Community Medicine, Tufts School of Medicine, Boston, MA
Kenneth K. H. Chui, PhD, MS/MPH , Department of Public Health and Community Medicine, Tufts University, Boston, MA
“Health care" is commonly thought to be exclusively provided by health professionals, such as physicians and nurses. Yet in the US there are 50 million caregivers who provide informal care to individuals living with disabilities and chronic illness, comprising a critical part of the healthcare delivery. The provision of informal care is essential both to the care recipients and to society because it reduces costs and strains on the healthcare system. Although there are positive health benefits of caregiving for the caregiver, the associations between caregiving and several negative health outcomes are well-documented. Few studies to date have examined how these associations differ by location and rurality, however. Therefore, the objective of this study was to assess how the association between caregiving and health status and specific health outcomes are modified by rurality. We used 2009 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) data to assess the potential for effect modification by rurality using stratification and adjusting for interaction terms. Our findings suggest that the negative associations between caregiving and several health outcomes, including self-reported health, exercise, and mental health status, are stronger for caregivers living in rural areas, compared to those in more urban areas. These findings suggest that caregivers in rural communities may be less likely to have the social support and infrastructure needed to. Additionally, these findings support the need to develop policies and programs designed to protect the health of rural informal caregivers, to maintain and strengthen this vital component of health care across the US.

Learning Areas:
Advocacy for health and health education
Biostatistics, economics
Conduct evaluation related to programs, research, and other areas of practice
Planning of health education strategies, interventions, and programs
Public health or related research
Social and behavioral sciences

Learning Objectives:
1. Describe the impact of informal caregiving in the United States on specific health outcomes: self-reported health, exercise, diet, stress, and depression. 2. Analyze the potential for the magnitude of the association between informal caregiving and health outcomes to be modified by rurality.

Keywords: Caregivers, Rural Health

Presenting author's disclosure statement:

Qualified on the content I am responsible for because: I have training in biostatistics, epidemiology, and demography as applied to public health and I have conducted the analysis described in the abstract.
Any relevant financial relationships? No

I agree to comply with the American Public Health Association Conflict of Interest and Commercial Support Guidelines, and to disclose to the participants any off-label or experimental uses of a commercial product or service discussed in my presentation.