256790 Lessons learned from Oregon's pursuit of public health accreditation

Monday, October 29, 2012 : 1:30 PM - 1:50 PM

Jean C. O'Connor, JD, DrPH , Oregon Health Authority, Public Health Division, State of Oregon, Portland, OR
Melvin A. Kohn, MD, MPH , Office of Disease Prevention and Epidemiology, Public Health Division, Oregon Department of Human Services, Portland, OR
Lydia Emer, MS , Oregon Health Authority, Public Health Division, State of Oregon, Portland, OR
Emilee Coulter-Thompson, MSW , Performance Management Program, Oregon Health Authority Public Health Division, Portland, OR
Anona Gund, MPH , Oregon Health Authority, Public Health Division, State of Oregon, Portland, OR
Oregon has been aggressively pursuing health reform. In tandem with these efforts to address health care cost and quality, Oregon is also working to reform the public health system to improve prevention. Accreditation, which recognizes state and local health departments that demonstrate the 10 essential services, has the potential to be a tool to evolve the public health system. As one component of a CDC grant-funded project to enhance the public health policy and quality improvement infrastructure and accelerate accreditation readiness, Oregon's state public health agency is working to complete the three major required pre-requisites (i.e., State Health Assessment, Agency Strategic Plan, and State Health Improvement Plan) needed to submit a letter of intent to apply for accreditation by September of 2012. Oregon's state public health agency has also provided grants to 13 of Oregon's 34 local health departments to help accelerate accreditation readiness. This presentation will highlight lessons learned from Oregon's first year of accreditation-related efforts, including: 1) engaging partners within and outside of the public health system; 2) developing the state-level pre-requisite documents in the context of health reform; 3) the strategic value of state and local partnerships in evolving the public health system; and, 4) use of the accreditation processes to better align and leverage resources within a public health system. An informal mid-year assessment in Oregon suggests that while accreditation itself is merely a designation, the careful self-study involved in accreditation pre-requisites can offer public health leaders the opportunity to refocus their organization and programs.

Learning Areas:
Administration, management, leadership

Learning Objectives:
At the conclusion of the presentation, participants will be able to: 1) Discuss the national public health accreditation movement and the organizations involved in accreditation and public health quality improvement initiatives; 2) Explain the risks and benefits to health agencies of pursuing public health accreditation; and 3) Assess the relative readiness of an organization to submit a letter of intent for public health accreditation.

Keywords: Accreditation, Leadership

Presenting author's disclosure statement:

Qualified on the content I am responsible for because: I am the Principal Investigator on the CDC grant that funds public health accreditation-related work in the State of Oregon, the Deputy Director of the Oregon Division of Public Health, and an Adjunct Associate Professor with Emory's Rollins School of Public Health.
Any relevant financial relationships? No

I agree to comply with the American Public Health Association Conflict of Interest and Commercial Support Guidelines, and to disclose to the participants any off-label or experimental uses of a commercial product or service discussed in my presentation.