260211 Effectiveness of a New Computer-based ATOD Prevention Program Compared to a Group Version in Schools

Tuesday, October 30, 2012 : 11:10 AM - 11:30 AM

Karol L. Kumpfer, PhD , Department of Health Promotion and Education, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT
Adolescent substance abuse has increased for 4 years (OAS, 2011). According to the Cochrane Reviews, the most successful adolescent ATOD prevention program is the Strengthening Families Program (SFP). The group classes, which parents and youth attend together, teach parenting, family and youth social skills. SFP is cost effective ($11 saved/dollar spent) (Miller & Hendrie, 2008), yet costly to administer—$500 to $1000/family for a 7-14 week group. Methods. To reduce costs to $3.50/family, a new universal 10-session Home Use SFP 8 to 16 Years DVD was created and evaluated with14,221 families who completed a confidential online survey to win prizes. A 10-ten session SFP Group version was also created and tested with families in schools as a comparison condition in a quasi-experimental repeated measures 2 group x 2 (pre-and post-test) design. 21 outcomes were measured using the SFP questionnaire. Within and between group results were analyzed using 2 x 2 ANOVAs and compared to the SFP 10- and 14-session norms. Results. Compared to the group version, the Home Use DVD outcomes revealed 18 of 21 statistically significant outcomes and almost as large Cohen's d effect sizes for parenting (d = .48 vs. 65) and family outcomes (d = .69 vs. .70), but better youth results (d = .54 vs. .48). The SFP school group results will be presented. Conclusions. Because of the positive results on substance abuse and child maltreatment, the new DVDs and school curriculum will be widely disseminated at cost to have a broader public health impact.

Learning Areas:
Administer health education strategies, interventions and programs
Advocacy for health and health education
Conduct evaluation related to programs, research, and other areas of practice
Diversity and culture
Implementation of health education strategies, interventions and programs
Planning of health education strategies, interventions, and programs

Learning Objectives:
1. Compare the results of a computer-based ATOD prevention program to those of a much more costly group based version containng the identical content. 2. Discuss the importance of ATOD prevention focusing on family interventions as compared to youth only interventions. 3. Differentiate the percent of youth prevented from ATOD use who participate in family interentions compared to youth only school intervention.

Keywords: Substance Abuse Prevention, School-Based Programs

Presenting author's disclosure statement:

Qualified on the content I am responsible for because: I have been the principal or co-principal of multiple federally funded grants focusing on the prevention of adolescent drug abuse, delinquency and crime prevention and co-occurring mental and drug use disorders. Among my scientific interests has been the development of computer technologies and cultural adaptations to increasing the effectiveness of ATOD revention. Until 2000, I was also the Director of SAMHSA's Center for Substance Abuse Prevention (CSAP) and promoted funding evdence-based prevention programs.
Any relevant financial relationships? Yes

Name of Organization Clinical/Research Area Type of relationship
LutraGroup Evaluation Studies Independent Contractor (contracted research and clinical trials)

I agree to comply with the American Public Health Association Conflict of Interest and Commercial Support Guidelines, and to disclose to the participants any off-label or experimental uses of a commercial product or service discussed in my presentation.