263695 Identifying Missed Opportunities: Contraceptive dispensing at postpartum visits in publicly funded programs

Tuesday, October 30, 2012 : 10:55 AM - 11:15 AM

Heike Thiel de Bocanegra, PhD, MPH , Assistant Professor and Director, UCSF Family PACT Evaluation, University of California, San Francisco, Sacramento, CA
Richard Chang, MPH , Bixby Center for Global Reproductive Health, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, Sacramento, CA
Michael Howell, MA , Bixby Center for Global Reproductive Health, University of California, San Francisco, Sacramento
Mary Menz, PHN, BSN , Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, Bixby Center for Global Reproductive Health, Sacramento, CA
Philip Darney, MD, MSc , Bixby Center for Global Reproductive Health, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
In the U.S., over a third of pregnancies (35.3%) were conceived within 18 months of a previous birth. These suboptimal inter-pregnancy intervals (IPIs) are especially common among low-income women who receive publicly funded services. Women with suboptimal IPIs are at increased risk of preterm birth and adverse maternal and infant health outcomes. The provision of contraception immediately after birth helps to prevent premature conception and facilitates optimal birth spacing. We identified 2nd or higher order births from California's 2008 Birth Statistical Master File and calculated the inter-pregnancy interval between the birth in 2008 and the previous (index) birth. We assessed whether women had a visit to a publicly funded program (Medi-Cal or Family PACT, California's Medicaid family planning expansion) within 60 days of the birth and whether they received contraceptive services at those visits. Of the 98,836 women seen by a publicly-funded program provider within 60 days after delivery, only 41% received contraception (28% from Medi-Cal 28% and 13% from Family PACT). A significantly higher proportion of women who did not receive contraception had suboptimal IPIs (n=25,765; 44.2%) than women who received contraception (n=12,340; 30.4%). A total of 11.1% of women without contraception had very short IPIs (under 6 months between birth and conception) compared to 4.9% of women who received contraception. We will describe the demographic profile of women with suboptimal and extremely short IPIs. The findings suggest that identifying missed opportunities to dispense contraception during postpartum visits can be an efficient strategy to ensure optimal inter-pregnancy intervals.

Learning Areas:
Administer health education strategies, interventions and programs
Conduct evaluation related to programs, research, and other areas of practice
Program planning

Learning Objectives:
1. Describe the importance of optimal inter-pregnancy intervals for maternal and child health 2. Identify the importance of timely contraception in achieving optimal inter-pregnancy intervals 3. List three demographic attributes of women likely to have suboptimal inter-pregancy intervals

Keywords: Contraception, Pregnancy

Presenting author's disclosure statement:

Qualified on the content I am responsible for because: I am responsible for the design of the study and oversee the analytical approach and interpretation. I have been the director of UCSF’s evaluation of California’s Family PACT (Planning, Access, Care, and Treatment) Program since 2005.
Any relevant financial relationships? No

I agree to comply with the American Public Health Association Conflict of Interest and Commercial Support Guidelines, and to disclose to the participants any off-label or experimental uses of a commercial product or service discussed in my presentation.