264555 FoodCORE: Foodborne Diseases Centers for Outbreak Response Enhancement - Improving foodborne disease outbreak response capacity in state and local health departments

Monday, October 29, 2012 : 11:20 AM - 11:35 AM

Jennifer R. Mitchell, MPH, CHES , Outbreak Response and Prevention Branch/Division of Foodborne, Waterborne, and Environmental Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA
Gwen Biggerstaff, MSPH , Outbreak Response and Prevention Branch/Division of Foodborne, Waterborne, and Environmental Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA
Jennifer G. Wright, DVM, MPH, DACVPM , Outbreak Response and Prevention Branch/Division of Foodborne, Waterborne, and Environmental Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA
FoodCORE Sites , Outbreak Response and Prevention Branch/Division of Foodborne, Waterborne, and Environmental Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA
Background: Each year foodborne diseases (FBD) cause illness in approximately 1 in 6 Americans, resulting in 128,000 hospitalizations and 3,000 deaths. Decreasing resources impact the ability of public health officials to identify, respond to, and control FBD outbreaks. FoodCORE was established during 2010 to address gaps in FBD outbreak response by improving capacity in three core areas: laboratory, epidemiologic, and environmental health activities. Methods: FoodCORE sites work collaboratively to develop and implement best practice models for surveillance and rapid, coordinated, and standardized response to FBD outbreaks. Successes are documented using performance metrics based on the Council for Improving Foodborne Outbreak Response Guidelines. FoodCORE sites convene regularly, provide quarterly reports, and collaborate with other FBD programs to discuss, document, and share best practices. Results: The current FoodCORE sites are Connecticut, New York City, Ohio, South Carolina, Tennessee, Utah, and Wisconsin. Since implementation, sites have improved completeness and timeliness for laboratory and epidemiologic activities. On average, over 95% of Salmonella, Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli, and Listeria (SSL) isolates were subtyped. Epidemiology staff followed up with nearly 90% of all reported SSL cases. FoodCORE sites routinely engage environmental health and/or regulatory partners, and are active participants in national outbreak surveillance. Conclusions: FoodCORE promotes the evaluation and application of surveillance and investigation strategies to improve the detection, investigation, and control of FBD outbreaks. Enhanced outbreak response efforts can shorten the time it takes to identify a source of infection and pinpoint how and why contamination occurred, in order to limit additional illnesses and help prevent future FBD outbreaks.

Learning Areas:
Conduct evaluation related to programs, research, and other areas of practice
Epidemiology
Program planning
Public health or related organizational policy, standards, or other guidelines

Learning Objectives:
1.Name the three core areas of foodborne disease outbreak response enhancement from FoodCORE 2.Describe the improved response capacity demonstrated by the FoodCORE performance metrics 3.Discuss the best practices and FoodCORE successes presented

Keywords: Public Health Infrastructure, Food Safety

Presenting author's disclosure statement:

Qualified on the content I am responsible for because: I have been working on the FoodCORE program for over a year. I help to coordinate the ongoing communication and promotion activities across all FoodCORE sites as well as central program activities at the federal level.
Any relevant financial relationships? No

I agree to comply with the American Public Health Association Conflict of Interest and Commercial Support Guidelines, and to disclose to the participants any off-label or experimental uses of a commercial product or service discussed in my presentation.