273607 An Independent Audit of the Australian Food Industry's Voluntary Front of Pack Labelling Scheme for Energy Dense, Nutrition Poor Foods

Tuesday, October 30, 2012

Owen Carter, BA , Office of the Pro-Vice-Chancellor (Health Advancement), Edith Cowan University, Perth, Australia
Brennen Mills, BSc (Hons), BHSc , Office of the Pro-Vice-Chancellor, Edith Cowan University, Perth, Australia
Iain Pratt, BA , Cancer Council WA, Cancer Council WA, Perth, Australia
In 2006, the Australian food industry introduced a voluntary front of pack food labelling system, the Daily Intake Guide (DIG), similar to the US Nutrition Keys. The industry claims over 4000 food products currently feature the DIG, enabling claims it is a success story of industry self-regulation. However, there exist no independently verified data to indicate the effectiveness of the industry's self-regulation. A list was created of energy dense, nutrient poor (EDNP) snack foods and drinks. Nine supermarkets were visited, and a comprehensive audit was created per category of DIG labels appearing on each and the surface area of each pack front. Of 752 EDNP food and drink products audited, the DIG was present on nearly two-thirds (64%). However, of these 80% displayed the "energy alone" variant of the DIG with information on energy content, but neither saturated fat nor sugar. Of those displaying saturated fat and sugar content, most (75%) were budget supermarket brands and fewer than 5% of branded products featured such information. Most manufacturers (80%) were found to be using the DIG "energy alone" label in breach of the industry's own DIG Code of Conduct that suggests such should only be used for packaging with limited space. A majority of Australian manufacturers of EDNP snack foods and drinks have adopted the DIG, but few are willing to display saturated fat and sugar content. Nearly 9 in 10 manufacturers are in direct breach of the industry's own DIG codes, seriously questioning claims that industry self-regulation has been successful.

Learning Areas:
Administer health education strategies, interventions and programs
Chronic disease management and prevention
Planning of health education strategies, interventions, and programs
Public health or related laws, regulations, standards, or guidelines

Learning Objectives:
1. Identify limitations of the Australian food industry's self-regulation for nutrition labelling on front-of-package for energy/dense nutrition poor foods and beverages. 2. Draw parallels with current US standards. 3. Formulate an opinion on the benefits and limitations associated with the food industry's self-regulation of front-of-package food labelling.

Keywords: Public Health Education and Health Promotion, Food and Nutrition

Presenting author's disclosure statement:

Qualified on the content I am responsible for because: I am Chief Investigator A for the research grant funding this project. I am currently utlising the data provided from this research for my Master of Science (public Health) dissertation. I am lead author and co-author for a number of obesity- and nutrition label-related publications.
Any relevant financial relationships? No

I agree to comply with the American Public Health Association Conflict of Interest and Commercial Support Guidelines, and to disclose to the participants any off-label or experimental uses of a commercial product or service discussed in my presentation.