5095.0: Wednesday, October 24, 2001 - 2:10 PM

Abstract #24721

Runaway/homeless youth using federally funded shelters: National and regional disparity

Sanna J. Thompson, PhD1, David Pollio, PhD2, and Eugene Maguin, PhD1. (1) Social Work, University at Buffalo, 685 Baldy Hall, Box 601050, Buffalo, NY 14260, (2) School of Social Work, Washington University, One Brookings Dr., Box 1196, St. Louis, MO 63130-4899, , depollio@gwbmail.wustl.edu

Previous studies of runaway youth have utilized samples from specific geographic areas. However, no studies have addressed the question of whether runaway youth in different regions are similar/different to one another with respect to gender, ethnicity, age, or high-risk behaviors. To address this gap, this study 1) compares runaway shelter users to the U.S. youth population on age, gender, and ethnicity, 2) examines regional variations in demographics between runaway youth and the U.S. youth population, and 3) identifies differences between regions in the prevalence of high-risk behaviors: e.g. substance use, suicide, physical and sexual abuse. National data collected from federally-funded youth shelters in 1997 (n=16,652) and 1997 U.S. Census data for youth age 12-18 years (n=26,735,028) were used in this study. Shelter and census data were organized into ten federally classified regions. Results indicated that relative to the US youth population, youth between 13-16 years of age, a minority group member, and female were over-represented in the runaway sample. Runaway youth demographics were also markedly different across the ten regions. Finally, substantial regional disparity was found on sexual abuse, physical abuse, substance use, and discharge location. Findings suggest that runaway youth are demographically different from the U.S. youth population; federally-funded youth shelter populations also differ across geographical regions. This study highlights the need to address regional differences when formulating policy and services and to expect heterogeneity of runaway youth. Policy decisions require further research of regional and geographic differences, as information drawn from specific regions may be insufficient.

Learning Objectives: At the conclusion of the session, the participant in this session will be able to: 1) Identify differences between runaway youth shelter users and the US youth population on age, gender and ethnicity. 2) Articulate issues related to regional disparity among runaway youth shelter users on important high-risk behaviors. 3) Recognize regional disparity and heterogeneity of runaway youth when formulating policy and developing services for this population.

Presenting author's disclosure statement:
Organization/institution whose products or services will be discussed: None
Disclosure not received
Relationship: Not Received.

The 129th Annual Meeting of APHA