4216.0: Tuesday, October 23, 2001 - 2:45 PM

Abstract #29442

Contribution of immunization registries to practice-based assessment of coverage rates

Matilde Irigoyen, MD1, Sally E. Findley, PhD2, Amy Metroka3, Shaofu Chen, PhD1, Arturo Caesar, MD1, Claudina Wallace, MD1, and Stephen Friedman, MD3. (1) Department of Pediatrics, Columbia University, 622 West 168th Street, VC4-402, New York, NY 10032, 212-305-7016, mi5@columbia.edu, (2) Center for Population and Family Health, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, 60 Haven Avenue, B2, New York, NY 10032, (3) New York City Department of Health, New York, NY 10000

Background: Low immunization coverage may result from failure to receive vaccinations or incomplete documentation of immunizations delivered by secondary providers. Registries can be used to eliminate the problem of incomplete documentation and record scatter.

Objective: To assess the contribution of a citywide immunization registry to the assessment of practice-based immunization coverage rates.

Methods: In April 1999, we audited 858 randomly-selected medical records of children ages 18-35 months at 11 primary care practices serving a low-income, minority community in New York City. Records with MOGE documentation (4.5%) were excluded. Up-to-date (UTD) immunization status was assessed for DTP, polio, MMR, and Hib (4-3-1-3) as per the ACIP schedule. Parallel records were obtained from the New York Citywide Immunization Registry. Assessments were calculated with medical record data only and with both medical record and registry data.

Results: Medical records showed that 61.1% of the children were UTD. Registry data indicated that 46% of the children had received immunizations from other providers. Inclusion of registry data increased coverage by 10% to 71.3% (t=9.9, p<0.001). Half of the children (54.2%) received all vaccinations from their primary provider. In this group, 59.8% were UTD. The other half of the children received immunizations from both primary and secondary providers, and their coverage was 85.0% (t=8.5, p<0.001).

Conclusions: Use of multiple providers significantly increased immunization coverage rates. Without a comprehensive record of immunizations from the citywide registry, practice-based assessments significantly underestimate immunization coverage.

Learning Objectives: To identify the impact of record scatter on practice-based immunization assessments and to clarify the utility of immunization registries.

Keywords: Immunizations, Registry

Presenting author's disclosure statement:
Organization/institution whose products or services will be discussed: None
Disclosure not received
Relationship: Not Received.

The 129th Annual Meeting of APHA