The 131st Annual Meeting (November 15-19, 2003) of APHA

The 131st Annual Meeting (November 15-19, 2003) of APHA

4057.0: Tuesday, November 18, 2003 - Board 3

Abstract #56718

Racial/ethnic differences in preventive services use among older adults

Joseph J. Sudano, PhD, School of Medicine, Case Western Reserve University, MetroHealth Medical Center, Rammelkamp 236, 2500 MetroHealth Drive, Cleveland, OH 44109, 216-778-1399, jsudano@metrohealth.org and David W. Baker, MD, MPH, The Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, 676 N. St. Clair Street, Room 255, Chicago, IL 60611.

Objective: To determine factors that help explain racial/ethnic differences in preventive service usage.

Design: We used data from the 1992, 1994, and 1996 Health and Retirement Study (HRS), a nationally representative sample of adults age 51-61 in 1992. Outcome measures included 1996 questions about preventive services use in the past two years, including: influenza vaccination; cholesterol test; mammography, Pap test, breast self-examination (BSE); prostate examination. Logistic regression models were constructed to examine the degree to which sets of factors (health status, SES, insurance, health behaviors) help explain racial/ethnic differences in preventive services use.

Population: 5605 non-Hispanic whites (W), 1110 non-Hispanic blacks (B), 332 English-speaking Hispanics (E/H), and 253 Spanish-speaking Hispanics (S/H).

Findings: No significant differences in any services use were found between W and E/H. After controlling for SES and insurance, B and S/H likelihood of obtaining influenza vaccination increased, but the disparities were not totally eliminated. Lower SES and lack of insurance coverage completely explained the lower rates of prostate exams for B and S/H men compared to W. For B women, no significant disparities in preventive services use were found as compared to W. To the contrary, when SES and insurance coverage were added to the models, B women were more likely to have had a Pap test or mammogram as compared to W (12 and 14 percent, respectively). B women were 20 percent more likely to engage in BSE as compared to W. For S/H women, differences in unadjusted relative risks were eliminated after controls for health status. As with B women, S/H were more likely to have had a Pap test or mammogram after controlling for SES and insurance, but this likelihood was not statistically significant. Finally, S/H women were 20 percent less likely to perform BSE as compared to W, even after all control variables and covariates were included in the model.

Conclusions: SES and insurance help to explain much of the racial/ethnic disparities in preventive services use. However, lower SES or lack of insurance coverage did not explain the disparities in influenza vaccination for both B and S/H. Likewise, public health messages may have increased awareness of BSE for B but not for S/H women.

Implications for Policy, Delivery, or Practice: Public health initiatives should target minority populations with multi-lingual educational messages regarding the efficacy of preventive services. Expansion of health insurance coverage to the uninsured should also be re-examined.

Learning Objectives:

Keywords: Access and Services, Health Insurance

Presenting author's disclosure statement:
I do not have any significant financial interest/arrangement or affiliation with any organization/institution whose products or services are being discussed in this session.

Medical Care Section Poster Session #2

The 131st Annual Meeting (November 15-19, 2003) of APHA