The 131st Annual Meeting (November 15-19, 2003) of APHA

The 131st Annual Meeting (November 15-19, 2003) of APHA

5027.0: Wednesday, November 19, 2003 - Board 9

Abstract #68119

Colorectal screening methods in Maryland

Eileen Karen Steinberger, MD, MS1, Carmela Groves, RN, MS2, Annette Hopkins, RN, MS1, Ebenezer Israel, MD, MPH1, Jane Uman, BA, MPH1, Marsha Bienia, MBA2, Diane M. Dwyer, MD2, and Min Zhan, PhD1. (1) Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, University of Maryland, Baltimore, 660 W. Redwood Street, Baltimore, MD 21201, 410-767-0789, estein@epi.umaryland.edu, (2) Center for Cancer Surveillance and Control, Maryland Department of Health and Mental Hygiene, 201 West Preston Street, Baltimore, MD 21201

Introduction: Screening for colorectal cancer (CRC) is recommended for prevention and early detection. Methodology: A statewide population-based telephone survey was undertaken and weighted by the BRFSS protocol to determine current screening patterns in Maryland. Results: Based on preliminary data from 1488 respondents > 50 years of age, 25% reported never having had any CRC testing. Of those ever tested, 25% were tested for a specific problem (not for screening). Of those ever tested for screening (“screened”) (56% of the entire population), 26% had FOBT only, 5% had sigmoidoscopy alone, 16% had sigmoidoscopy + FOBT, and 53% had colonoscopy +/- FOBT. More persons had endoscopy for screening in urban vs. rural areas (54% vs. 48% for colonoscopy, 21% vs. 19% for sigmoidoscopy). The opposite is true of FOBT only (urban 24% vs. rural 33%). Among those ever screened: use of FOBT alone decreased with age; colonoscopy rates increased with age; men had higher rates of screening colonoscopy compared to women (55% vs. 51%); blacks had higher rates than whites (65% vs. 49%.) Of those persons who were ever screened, 85% are “currently screened” in accordance with American Cancer Society guidelines. Conclusion: Colonoscopy and FOBT are the most common tests for CRC screening. Screening rates vary by locality (urban vs. rural), age, gender, and race.

Learning Objectives:

Keywords: Cancer Prevention, Cancer Screening

Presenting author's disclosure statement:
I do not have any significant financial interest/arrangement or affiliation with any organization/institution whose products or services are being discussed in this session.

MCH and Cancer Screening: Poster Session

The 131st Annual Meeting (November 15-19, 2003) of APHA