APHA
Back to Annual Meeting Page
 
American Public Health Association
133rd Annual Meeting & Exposition
December 10-14, 2005
Philadelphia, PA
APHA 2005
 
4053.0: Tuesday, December 13, 2005 - 9:00 AM

Abstract #115977

Evaluating the impact of full coverage communication programs: An analysis from Zambia

Paul Hutchinson, PhD, School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine, Tulane University, 1440 Canal Street, Suite 2200, New Orleans, LA 70112, 504 585-6078, phutchin@tulane.edu and Jennifer Wheeler, MPH, Department of International Health & Development, Tulane University, 1440 Canal St, Suite 2200, New Orleans, LA 70112.

Evaluations of national full-coverage health behavior change communication campaigns are frequently plagued by reliance on measures of self-reported exposure to media messages from the same population-based surveys in which data for behavior change are collected. Self-reported exposure to media messages complicates evaluations since it is likely to be non-random, reflecting a variety of measured characteristics (e.g. access to media, attitudes, education) and unmeasured characteristics of respondents (e.g. motivations, health conscientiousness, or supply-side variables). Numerous studies (Kincaid and Do 2003; Guilkey, Hutchinson and Lance 2004) have noted that improper heed being paid to non-random exposure may lead to estimates of the effectiveness of communication efforts that are substantially biased upwards. In order to address non-random reporting of exposure, multivariate evaluation techniques with suitable controls are required. This study employs and compares the performance of two quantitative methods to address and correct for the problems of non-random assignment of individuals to treatment (exposed to the communication program) and control groups (non-exposed): (1) multivariate regression methods with instrumental variables to purge estimates of exposure of common unmeasured effects across recall and behaviors and (2) propensity score matching to compare behavior change across groups with similar likelihoods of exposure. These methods are used with data from the 2000/2001 Zambia Demographic and Health Survey to gauge the effectiveness of the multi-media Better Health Campaign which covered numerous health topics through specific media campaigns such as “Your Health Matters” and “AIDS and the Family.” Multiple reproductive health and family planning behaviors are examined.

Learning Objectives:

  • By the end of the session, participants will be able

    Keywords: Communication Evaluation,

    Presenting author's disclosure statement:

    I wish to disclose that I have NO financial interests or other relationship with the manufactures of commercial products, suppliers of commercial services or commercial supporters.

    [ Recorded presentation ] Recorded presentation

    Monitoring and Evaluation: Implementing and Evaluating Reproductive Health Programs

    The 133rd Annual Meeting & Exposition (December 10-14, 2005) of APHA