Back to Annual Meeting

Back to Annual Meeting

APHA Scientific Session and Event Listing

Daniel A. Maceira, Ph D, Department of Health Economics, Center for the Study of the State and Society (CEDES), Sánchez de Bustamante 27, Buenos Aires, C1173AAA, Argentina, (54-11) 4861-2126, danielmaceira@cedes.org

Health care systems in developing countries traditionally failed in providing coverage to the poor. Lack of financial resources and weak regulatory institutions do not allow to reduce existent equity gaps associated with income. Latin American countries have developed social insurance institutions in parallel to the public sector to improve formal coverage, increase collection of funds and avoid families' financial limitations to receive health care services. The goal of the study is to identify, in the context of the Argentinean health care system, the mechanisms of social protection (market insurance, self insurance and self protection) used by population quintiles, establishing their effectiveness to relief financial shocks associated with health care expenditures (ambulatory, outpatient care and pharmaceuticals) that eventually increase the probability of falling below the poverty line. The comparative analysis is based on data originated in three household surveys (1997-2002 and 2003), complemented with socio-demographic characteristics and the organization of the national social health insurance system. As the presence of different mechanisms of social protection is not related with the individual's ability to choose among systems, but with the family income. Income defines the access to formal social insurance mechanisms and the possibility of contracting private market insurance plans. Moreover, the presence of self-insurance and self-protection is strongly related with income. Results also show the lack of ability of market insurance schemes to control out-of-pocket expenditures, mainly triggered by induced demand in geographical areas with strong supply of health care providers. Comparisons before and after the macroeconomic crisis that followed the 2002 devaluation show the reduction of formal health coverage, as well as the limitations of alternative social protection mechanisms. In all cases the public sector, as provider of last resort, was in charge of filling the gap, especially in lower income groups and relative poorer regions of the country.

Learning Objectives:

• At the conclusion of the session, the participants will be able to identify the social protection mechanisms existing in Argentina and to understand the relative weight of each in the health coverage of the population in the presence of eventually catastrophic financial shocks related to expenditures on health.

Presenting author's disclosure statement:

Not Answered