In this Section |
145444 Looking back at Buck v. BellMonday, November 5, 2007: 10:45 AM
Few opinions in United States Supreme Court history are as shocking as the decision written by Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes in the 1927 case of Buck v. Bell. That lawsuit, which challenged a Virginia law allowing the state mandated sexual sterilization of epileptics, the mentally retarded and others judged “socially inadequate,” concluded with Holmes declaring: “Three generations of imbeciles are enough.” The Buck decision is unique in the history of medical jurisprudence as the only occasion in which the Supreme Court has endorsed surgery on unwilling patients as a tool of state public health policy. The Buck case provided a precedent that allowed the majority of American States--more than 30 by the late 1930s--to sterilize citizens suspected of posing a threat to the nation's gene pool. This session will explore the Buck case and its aftermath.
Learning Objectives: Keywords: Reproductive Health, Women's Health
Presenting author's disclosure statement:
Any relevant financial relationships? No I agree to comply with the American Public Health Association Conflict of Interest and Commercial Support Guidelines, and to disclose to the participants any off-label or experimental uses of a commercial product or service discussed in my presentation.
See more of: Policing Reproduction: Lessons and Legacies of Eugenic Sterilization
See more of: Spirit of 1848 Caucus |