146012 Using the MEPS to Explain Current Mental Health Service Sector Use

Wednesday, November 7, 2007

Ashley Dunham, MSPH, PhD , Cecil G. Sheps Center for Health Services Research, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC
Marisa Domino, PhD , Department of Health Policy and Administration, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC
Bradley N. Gaynes, MD, MPH , Department of Psychiatry, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC
Using the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey, this research explores differences in service sector use for depression treatment for children, adults and the elderly. Specifically, do certain patient characteristics explain whether mental health care is received in the general medical care sector, the mental health care sector, or a combination of the two? Initial analyses include chi-square and logit models to explore and explain mental health service sector use. The dependent variable was service sector use for depression, defined as (1) psychiatry only, (2) general medical care plus other non-MD mental health care, (3) general medical care only, and (4) non-MD mental health care only. Initial results show that the elderly primarily receive mental health care for depression form the general medical care sector (65%), while children primarily receive services from a psychiatrist (58%). Initial logit results show mixed results. For the elderly, having a usual source of care, age, physical health and education significantly predict service sector type. For adults, gender, mental health status, marital status, and mental health comorbidities predict service sector use for depression. For children, gender, having a usual source of care, and mental health comorbidities affect service sector use for depression. In conclusion, service sector use for depression varies among age groups and services are received in a wide variety of settings. Further research should explore why the elderly prefer using primary care only for depression treatment, and how the organization and financing of care can be structured to deliver optimal depression treatment across service sectors.

Learning Objectives:
1. Identify current service sector use for depression. 2. Describe patient characteristics that predict how and by whom mental health care is received. 3. Understand how service delivery systems may be created to target certain populations at risk for mental health needs.

Presenting author's disclosure statement:

Any relevant financial relationships? No
Any institutionally-contracted trials related to this submission?

I agree to comply with the American Public Health Association Conflict of Interest and Commercial Support Guidelines, and to disclose to the participants any off-label or experimental uses of a commercial product or service discussed in my presentation.