147818 Logic model for chlamydia interventions at the state and local level

Sunday, November 4, 2007

Wiley D. Jenkins, PhD, MPH , Family and Community Medicine, Southern Illinois University School of Medicine, Springfield, IL
Edward Mensah, PhD , Public Health Informatics Program-Health Policy and Administration Division, University of Illinois @ Chicago, Chicago, IL
Background – The current STD intervention policy in Illinois is largely developed at the local level. The state health department (S-HD) provides testing and data resources, but community outreaches and interventions are driven by local health departments (L-HD). Varying levels of training, technical skill and resource availability create opportunities for ineffective/inefficient interventions.

Objective – The purpose of this study is to create a logic model, including Inputs, Processes and Outcomes sections, of the current intervention development, implementation and review process and offer an alternative. The objective is the development of a more cost-effective intervention strategy by comparing the existing policy and its limitations to a new policy and its potential benefits.

Methods – Two members of the S-HD STD staff, and thirteen STD staff members in L-HDs throughout Illinois were interviewed. The logic model for the current policy was created from these case studies. A comparison model was created for the proposed policy.

Results – The proposed model adds the element of Geographic Information System analysis and Census Bureau data from the S-HD to the Inputs section, an intervention evaluation for effectiveness to the processes, and a cost-effectiveness analysis to outcomes. With evaluations built into Processes and Outcomes in the proposed model, both individual interventions and the entire process may be evaluated for effectiveness.

Conclusions – The proposed model provides an experimental input for STD intervention and the means to evaluate its effectiveness and worth. This model may also be utilized for other infectious disease intervention development, and as an aid in conserving limited resources.

Learning Objectives:
1. Describe how state health department involvement in non-testing intervention development differs between the current and proposed models. 2. List three differences between the current and proposed models. 3. Discuss how the proposed evaluation processes may be utilized for other STD or infectious disease interventions.

Keywords: Management, Evaluation

Presenting author's disclosure statement:

Any relevant financial relationships? No
Any institutionally-contracted trials related to this submission?

I agree to comply with the American Public Health Association Conflict of Interest and Commercial Support Guidelines, and to disclose to the participants any off-label or experimental uses of a commercial product or service discussed in my presentation.