149131
Making local level tobacco policy: But will I be re-elected?
Monday, November 5, 2007: 2:48 PM
Orion McCotter, MPH
,
Zuckerman College of Public Health, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ
John Sciacca, PhD
,
College of Health and Human Services, Nothern Arizona University, Flagstaff, AZ
Developing clean indoor air policies at the local level is often the first step in moving toward a statewide smoke-free policy. Studies in local jurisdictions in Arizona have shown that local level policy makers are reluctant to address the issue of tobacco control. Local level policy makers may personally support clean indoor air ordinances and understand that the general public supports these laws, but they fear that by proposing or supporting these laws they will jeopardize their chances of being re-elected. Based on the experience of 92 local level policy makers who voted on a total of 15 tobacco use ordinances over the past five years, we show that chances of re-election are increased for those who vote in favor of an ordinance that restricts where tobacco can be used, regardless of the strength of the ordinance.
Learning Objectives: 1. Articulate the argument for developing tobacco policy at the local level.
2. Identify Arizona local level policy makers' attitudes about tobacco policy.
3. Describe the relationship between voting for a tobacco control ordinance and being re-elected in Arizona.
4. Explain how this information can be used to influence local level policy makers in other jurisdictions.
Keywords: Tobacco Policy, Advocacy
Presenting author's disclosure statement:Any relevant financial relationships? No Any institutionally-contracted trials related to this submission?
I agree to comply with the American Public Health Association Conflict of Interest and Commercial Support Guidelines,
and to disclose to the participants any off-label or experimental uses of a commercial product or service discussed
in my presentation.
|