150057 An evaluation of the SmartMark safety training for construction workers: Changes in safety knowledge and attitudes

Monday, November 5, 2007

Emile Jorgensen, MPH , Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL
Rosemary K. Sokas, MD, MOH, MSc , Office of Occupational Medicine, Occupational Safety and Health Administration, Washington, DC
Leslie A. Nickels , Division of Environmental and Occupational Health Sciences, University of Illinois at Chicago School of Public Health, Chicago, IL
Weihua Gao, MS , Quantitative Biomedical Sciences Program, School of Public Health, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL
Janie Gittleman, PhD, MRP , CPWR The Center for Construction Research and Training, Silver Spring, MD
Background: Construction workers experience high rates of traumatic occupational injury. This pilot project was conducted with union roofers and pipefitters to evaluate the effect of a safety training program (SmartMark) on safety knowledge, attitude, self-reported practice, climate, and workplace injury experience. KAP assessment focused on fall and electrical safety training modules given as part of an OSHA ten hour hazard awareness program. Methods: English-only and English-Spanish questionnaires were self-completed immediately prior to safety training. Telephone follow-up questionnaires were administered by bilingual interviewers three months later. Electrical knowledge was assessed for a subset of the original questions that distinguished high scorers from low scorers, determined using the D-test. The differences in pre-intervention and post-intervention responses were tested using the Wilcoxon signed rank test. Results: More roofers were born in Mexico [n=38 (26%) vs. 0 pipefitters] and have less than a high school education [n=16 (11%) vs. 0 pipefitters]. After exclusions, 175 workers responded before the training and 92 (53%) responded to the follow-up questionnaire [76 roofers, 16 pipefitters] . Fall safety knowledge improved for roofers and pipefitters [Roofers: mean increase=7%, p<0.011; Pipefitters: mean increase=35%, p<0.0001] Electrical safety knowledge only improved in roofers. [Mean increase=10%, p<0.0005]. Baseline safety attitudes were quite positive [for 6 questions, range of means: 3.1-3.9 on a 4 point scale]. Improvement was found for questions on the value of safety (fall p<0.0005; electrical p<0.004). Self-reported injuries were infrequent [6 (3%) pre-training]. Conclusion: Training measurably improved fall and electrical safety knowledge and some safety attitudes at three months.

Learning Objectives:
1) describe the methodology used to evaluate safety attitude; 2) describe the methodology used to evaluate safety knowledge; 3) discuss challenges to evaluating training outcomes.

Keywords: Occupational Safety, Training

Presenting author's disclosure statement:

Any relevant financial relationships? No
Any institutionally-contracted trials related to this submission?

I agree to comply with the American Public Health Association Conflict of Interest and Commercial Support Guidelines, and to disclose to the participants any off-label or experimental uses of a commercial product or service discussed in my presentation.