150616 Etiology and consequences of injuries to veterinary technicians

Monday, November 5, 2007: 9:00 AM

Leslie D. Nordgren, PhD Candidate , Division of Environmental Health Sciences, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN
Susan G. Gerberich, PhD , MCOHS/RIRRC/CVPC, Division of Environmental Health Sciences, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN
Bruce H. Alexander, PhD , Regional Injury Prevention Research Center, Division of Environmental Health Sciences, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN
Andrew D. Ryan, MS , Regional Injury Prevention Research Center, Division of Environmental Health Sciences, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN
Timothy R. Church, PhD , Division of Environmental Health Sciences, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN
Jeff B. Bender, DVM, MS, DACVPM , Center for Animal Health and Food Safety, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN
Little is known about work-related injuries to Certified Veterinary Technicians (CVTs). A two-phase study was implemented to determine the frequency and consequences of and risk factors for injuries in all 1,427 CVTs, certified in Minnesota. First, a mailed survey collected data on demographics, personal characteristics, injury occurrences, and consequences from the previous 12 months (74% response). Subsequently, a mailed case-control study of bite injuries collected data on bite exposures, activities, clinic or department characteristics, use of animal restraint, and workplace safety culture. Cases (n=301) were questioned about exposures in the month before the incident; controls (n=567) were questioned about exposures on a randomly selected working month from all months during the study period. We identified potentially confounding variables for multiple logistic regression from causal directed acyclic graphs. Injury rates per 100 persons per year included: all injuries, 188; and bites, 69. Of the most severe injuries, primary types were: bites, 52%; cuts/lacerations/scratches, 31%; bruises/contusions, 22%; abrasions, 9%; sprains/strains, 7%; punctures/needle sticks, 5%. For all injuries leading sources were: cats (47%), dogs (35%), and lifting animals or equipment (9%). Injury consequences included: treatment, 78%; restricted work activity, 27%; lost time from work, 13%; and persistent symptoms, 9%. Multivariate modeling identified increased risks for handling animals <5 years, belief injuries not preventable, <25 years of age, and reduced risks for working <8 hours/week, and working in university, mixed, or commercial industrial practices. Many CVTs experience injuries with serious consequences. Further identification of risk factors is integral to the development of preventive interventions.

Learning Objectives:
1. Indentify the rates and consequences of injuries to veterinary technicians 2. Discuss the potential risk and protective factors associated with all injuries to veterinary technicians 3. Consider the risk and protective factors associated with bite injuries.

Presenting author's disclosure statement:

Any relevant financial relationships? No
Any institutionally-contracted trials related to this submission?

I agree to comply with the American Public Health Association Conflict of Interest and Commercial Support Guidelines, and to disclose to the participants any off-label or experimental uses of a commercial product or service discussed in my presentation.