150617 Local public health agency notification and detection during a multi-state e. coli O157:H7 outbreak

Tuesday, November 6, 2007: 12:50 PM

Paul A. Biedrzycki, MPH, MBA , Health Department, City of Milwaukee, Milwaukee, WI
Angela Hagy, MSPH , Health Department, City of Milwaukee, Milwaukee, WI
Mat Wolters, MS , Health Department, City of Milwaukee, Milwaukee, WI
Geoffrey R. Swain, MD, MPH , University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, City of Milwaukee Health Department, Milwaukee, WI
M. Stephen Gradus, PhD , Milwaukee Health Department Laboratories, Milwaukee, WI
Ajaib Singh, DVM, PhD , Milwaukee Health Department Laboratories, Milwaukee, WI
Syndromic surveillance systems have been implemented by some local public health agencies (LPHAs) in effort to improve early detection and warning to outbreaks or disease occurrence and transmission of public health importance. Federal initiatives such as Biosense1 and the Electronic Surveillance System for Early Notification of Community Epidemics (ESSENCE)2 have been developed to augment community-wide “situational awareness” along with the National Electronic Disease Surveillance System (NEDSS)3 to increase timeliness of disease reporting. However, these technologies have yet to be fully validated against actual outbreaks and cost-effectiveness has yet to be determined. Meanwhile, traditional public health surveillance and communication networks must remain concurrent and redundant to ensure adequate and effective notification and response.

The recent multi-state E. coli O157:H7 spinach outbreak provides a compelling example of the need to maintain strong relationships with community public health partners and underscores the importance of rapid communication to public health authorities when unusual events are detected. In this particular outbreak, the City of Milwaukee Health Department (MHD) was alerted through a variety of networks and agencies, not through emerging technologies or real-time data retrieval systems. This “early warning system” of established community partners provided the MHD the necessary epidemiologic intelligence in advance of State and Federal recognition and notification to local public health authorities.

LPHAs need to revisit and reinvent relationships that broaden the network of potential public health partners and to maintain a sufficient “strength of signal” that triggers further epidemiologic investigation of community-wide disease events

Learning Objectives:
1. Describe traditional surveillance methods used by local public health agencies in recognition of community outbreaks 2. Articulate various types of community partners that can enhance infectious disease surveillance by local public health agencies within a community 3. Recognize the limitations of current emerging technologies and federal initiatives as related to surveillance sensitivity and early warning and detection of outbreaks 4. Identify systems to enhance local public health agency "situational awareness" to both man-made and natural disease events within a community 5. Discuss possible improvements to local public health agency surveillance systems and networks through combinations of traditional and emerging surveillance technologies

Keywords: Outbreaks, Surveillance

Presenting author's disclosure statement:

Any relevant financial relationships? No
Any institutionally-contracted trials related to this submission?

I agree to comply with the American Public Health Association Conflict of Interest and Commercial Support Guidelines, and to disclose to the participants any off-label or experimental uses of a commercial product or service discussed in my presentation.

See more of: Infectious Disease Surveillance
See more of: Epidemiology