151133 Cost effectiveness of Chlamydia control services among family planning clients

Sunday, November 4, 2007

M. Antonia Biggs, PhD , Bixby Center for Reproductive Health Research and Policy, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
Diana Greene Foster, PhD , Bixby Center for Reproductive Health Research and Policy, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
Joan Chow, MPH, DrPH , Surveillance and Epidemiology Section, CA DHS Sexually Transmitted Disease Control Branch, Richmond, CA
Gorette Amaral, MHS , Bixby Center for Reproductive Health Research and Policy, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
Claire Brindis, DrPH , Philip R. Lee Institute for Health Policy Studies, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
Chlamydia trachomatis (CT) remains the most commonly reported infectious disease in the US. The pattern of CT transmission is difficult to interrupt due to its highly asymptomatic nature and high rates of reinfection. Many published cost-effectiveness models of CT screening suffer from major limitations, often ignoring reinfection. We developed a microsimulation model that incorporated the dynamics of infection acquisition, screening/diagnostic testing, treatment, partner management, and reinfection. We modeled 20,000 hypothetical FP/RH female and male clients and their partners through eight quarters or two years of CT exposure and treatment possibilities. This model examined several levels of partner management options—from no partner management, to scenarios with successful treatment from half of partners to all partners. This model incorporates the potential for reinfection among all male and female cases and allows for multiple partners. Screening all men and women with 100% partner management was the most effective way to prevent lower genital CT infection, resulting in approximately 6,700 fewer men and women infected with Chlamydia, 1,500 fewer women with chronic pelvic pain, and preventing over 10,000 PID cases, under 11,000 urethritis cases and 524 epididymitis cases. The costs averted by the prevention of negative health outcomes always exceeded program costs. Cost benefit ratios ranged from $1:$11 to $1:$35. Findings from this analysis demonstrate that the provision of Chlamydia control services are always cost-saving, and that more aggressive partner management strategies are a major factor in increasing a CT control program's cost-benefit ratio.

Learning Objectives:
1. Estimate the program costs associated with chlamydia control services 2. Estimate the negative health outcomes averted as a result of CT control services to male and female clients 3. Evaluate the most beneficial CT control service scenario for male and female clients and their partners

Presenting author's disclosure statement:

Any relevant financial relationships? No
Any institutionally-contracted trials related to this submission?

I agree to comply with the American Public Health Association Conflict of Interest and Commercial Support Guidelines, and to disclose to the participants any off-label or experimental uses of a commercial product or service discussed in my presentation.