153891 Are we getting the message about mercury? A survey to assess public awareness of mercury in fish

Monday, November 5, 2007

William Damsky , University of Vermont College of Medicine, Burlington, VT
Elizabeth Duncan , University of Vermont College of Medicine, Burlington, VT
Noreen Flanagan , University of Vermont College of Medicine, Burlington, VT
Karen Fromhold , University of Vermont College of Medicine, Burlington, VT
Dung Huynh , University of Vermont College of Medicine, Burlington, VT
Russell Meyer , University of Vermont College of Medicine, Burlington, VT
Jordan Sax , University of Vermont College of Medicine, Burlington, VT
William Bress, PhD , Vermont Department of Health, Burlington, VT
Razelle Hoffman-Contois, MS , Vermont Department of Health, Burlington, VT
Thomas V. Delaney, PhD , Dept of Pediatrics, UVM College of Medicine, Winter Safety Program, Burlington, VT
Jan K. Carney, MD MPH , Department of Medicine, University of Vermont College of Medicine, Burlington, VT
Exposure to mercury from environmental sources poses potential risks to public health, especially through fish consumption. Public education messages reaching vulnerable populations, particularly pregnant women and young children, can prevent health risks. The Vermont Department of Health has developed recommendations for safe intake levels for store bought and locally caught fish, including posters and brochures. University of Vermont College of Medicine students, in partnership with the Health Department, surveyed members of the public in Vermont's largest county regarding consumption practices and knowledge of consumption advice. Vulnerable populations were specifically targeted. Surveys included demographics, quantity and species consumed per month, knowledge of adverse health effects, and specific awareness of Vermont guidelines. 166 people were surveyed during a 6-week period. Nearly 80% reported awareness of adverse effects of mercury in fish; 48% reported awareness of Vermont consumption guidelines. Respondents reported low consumption of Vermont-caught fish (81% no consumption in a month). Canned tuna was consumed far more frequently: 42% consumed 1-2 meals per month, 19% 3-5 meals per month, 6% consumed 5 or more cans of tuna per month. For women of childbearing age, chi-squared analyses showed an association between the level of fish consumption and poster exposure (p< .05), and between level of consumption of fish and awareness of the Vermont advisory (p<.01). Further, for low tuna consumers, 61% who saw education materials (specifically posters), changed tuna consumption, fish intake, or limited their child's intake. Recommendations were made to expand current public education efforts, including more emphasis on canned tuna.

Learning Objectives:
1. Recognize health risks associated with mercury in fish 2. Describe practical methods to assess effectiveness of public education efforts 3. Discuss recommendations to more effectively reach vulnerable populations

Keywords: Environmental Health, Public Health Education and Health Promotion

Presenting author's disclosure statement:

Any relevant financial relationships? No
Any institutionally-contracted trials related to this submission?

I agree to comply with the American Public Health Association Conflict of Interest and Commercial Support Guidelines, and to disclose to the participants any off-label or experimental uses of a commercial product or service discussed in my presentation.