154003 Impact of living-unit interventions on college student drinking and related outcomes

Monday, November 5, 2007

Bradley O. Boekeloo, PhD, MS , Department of Public and Community Health, University of Maryland, College Park, MD
Melinda Griffin, ABD, MS , Department of Public and Community Health, University of Maryland, College Park, MD
Introduction: An effectiveness trial of a harm reduction approach was implemented to reduce college students' alcohol-related problems and improve quality of life in dormitory living-units (wings). Methodology: Students residing on predominantly freshmen wings at a large mid-Atlantic university were assigned one of three conditions: single (n=441) or mixed (n=405) gender intervention or control (n=423). Three alcohol-education workshops using the Information-Motivation-Behavior framework were implemented in intervention conditions early in the semester. A follow-up web-based survey was administered late in the semester: single (n=187) or mixed (n=164) gender intervention or control (n=200). Outcomes included personal (25 summed items, alpha=0.87) and secondhand (10 summed items, alpha=0.72) consequences, helping behaviors (11 summed items, alpha=0.91), and seven alcohol use items. Condition differences were analyzed with linear regression controlling for student demographics. Results: The single gender intervention condition decreased secondhand consequences (beta -.16. p=.04), weekly alcohol use (beta -.15, p=.04), and recent beer consumption (beta -.15, p=.05) among males. Among females, the mixed gender condition decreased personal (beta-.23, p=.004) and secondhand (beta -.14, p=.04) consequences, weekly use (beta -.14, p=.03), and recent binging (beta -.18, p=.005); the single gender condition decreased recent wine use (beta -.15, p=.03) and binging (beta -.15, p=.02). Conclusions: Students assigned to intervention conditions experienced fewer consequences and used less alcohol than those in the control condition. Males benefited more from single gender than mixed gender learning environments. This lends support to the use of a harm reduction intervention delivered to student living units on campuses to reduce problems associated with alcohol.

Learning Objectives:
1. Identify differences among 3 intervention groups and alcohol-related outcomes. 2. Discuss the importance of including living-units in alcohol prevention efforts. 3. Evaluate the effectiveness of a living-unit intervention on alcohol-related outcomes. 4. Describe effective college student living unit interventions.

Keywords: Behavioral Research, Alcohol Problems

Presenting author's disclosure statement:

Any relevant financial relationships? No
Any institutionally-contracted trials related to this submission?

I agree to comply with the American Public Health Association Conflict of Interest and Commercial Support Guidelines, and to disclose to the participants any off-label or experimental uses of a commercial product or service discussed in my presentation.