154012 Integrating Health Impact Assessment into the U.S. Environmental Impact Statement process: Examples from Alaskan oil and gas development, and implications for U.S. policy

Monday, November 5, 2007: 3:35 PM

Aaron A. Wernham, MD, MS , Division of Community Health Services, Alaska Native Tribal Health Consortium, Anchorage, AK
In this session, we will present what may be the first formal effort to integrate a Health Impact Assessment (HIA) into a federal Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) in the U.S.

The National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) of 1969 established U.S. environmental policy, directing federal agencies to consider the impact of major federal actions on the “human environment,” and creating the EIS process. NEPA declares that its fundamental purpose is stimulating “the health and welfare of man.” Federal regulations on its implementation make clear reference to the requirement to address human health. Yet as the implementation of this far-reaching legislation has evolved, EIS typically address human health marginally if at all.

Plans for oil and gas development in Alaska's Arctic are expanding rapidly, and threaten to encroach on the territory which supports the Inupiat people, and to create tremendous economic, social, cultural, and public health changes. Rural Alaska Native communities are heavily dependent on natural resources, and the North Slope Inupiat derive well over 50% of their nutritional needs from hunting and fishing in the region.

Together with the Alaska Inter-Tribal Council, the regional government for the North Slope recently began an unprecedented collaboration with the federal government to integrate HIAs into currently active EIS processes. We will present the results of these HIAs, discuss the statutory basis for their inclusion and the process of negotiation between the local community and the federal regulatory agencies, and review the potentially broad applications of this effort elsewhere in the U.S.

Learning Objectives:
1. Describe U.S. environmental regulations, including the National Environmental Policy Act and Executive Order 12989 on Environmental Justice, in terms of their utility for addressing environmental health concerns. 2. List 3 different pathways through which communities and public health agencies can participate in the environmental impact statement process. 3. Develop strategies for working with federal agencies to ensure adequate attention to public health in the EIS process. 4. Recognize the potential applications of Health Impact Assessment for federal actions with significant environmental effects.

Keywords: Alaska Natives, Environmental Justice

Presenting author's disclosure statement:

Any relevant financial relationships? No
Any institutionally-contracted trials related to this submission?

I agree to comply with the American Public Health Association Conflict of Interest and Commercial Support Guidelines, and to disclose to the participants any off-label or experimental uses of a commercial product or service discussed in my presentation.