155742
Impact of the 2006 Surgeon General's Report
Monday, November 5, 2007: 3:42 PM
Stephen Babb, MPH
,
Office on Smoking and Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA
Joel London, MPH
,
Office on Smoking and Health, Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA
Gabrielle Robinson Promoff, MPH
,
Office of Smoking and Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA
The 2006 Surgeon General's Report on The Health Consequences of Involuntary Exposure to Tobacco Smoke confirmed once and for all that secondhand smoke is a serious health hazard. The Report also makes clear that smoke-free environments are the only way to effectively protect nonsmokers from this hazard. The Report has had a decisive impact on a range of public and private policy decisions taken at the national, state, and local levels. This impact was immediate, and has continued over time. In many cases, policymakers specifically cited the Report's conclusions in announcing their decisions to make various settings smoke-free. Some policymakers and organizations that in the past had been skeptical about the science of secondhand smoke and had opposed smoke-free policies reversed their positions because of the Report. The Report has accelerated the spread of smoke-free environments, and appears to have helped push the United States past a tipping point on this issue. The session will include: (1) a review of the major conclusions of the Report; (2) a brief description of the actions taken by the CDC Office on Smoking and Health to communicate and widely disseminate the conclusions of the Report to the public; (3) an overview of the smoke-free policy activity that has occurred in the public and private sectors since the Report's release; (4) examples of ways in which state and local tobacco control programs have used the Report's findings to advance their objectives; and (5) a review of lessons learned.
Learning Objectives: 1. List the six major conclusions of the 2006 Surgeon General's Report.
2. Describe three effective approaches for disseminating scientific findings to the public.
3. Give three examples of the Report's impact on public and private sector policy decisions.
4. List three ways in which state and local tobacco control programs have used the Report's findings to advance their objectives.
Keywords: Communication, Tobacco Policy
Presenting author's disclosure statement:Any relevant financial relationships? No Any institutionally-contracted trials related to this submission?
I agree to comply with the American Public Health Association Conflict of Interest and Commercial Support Guidelines,
and to disclose to the participants any off-label or experimental uses of a commercial product or service discussed
in my presentation.
|