157453 Evaluation of the Effects of a Complex Care Management Program on Health-Related Quality of Life within a Medicaid Population

Wednesday, November 7, 2007: 9:15 AM

David M. Mosen, PhD, MPH , Kaiser Permanente Center for Health Research, Portland, OR
David Feeny, PhD , Kaiser Permanente Center for Health Research, Portland, OR
Richard Meenan, PhD, MPH , Kaiser Permanente Center for Health Research, Portland, OR
David Labby, MD , CareOregon, Portland, OR
Rebecca Ramsay, MPH , CareOregon, Portland, OR
Mark Spofford, PhD , Kaiser Permanente Center for Health Research, Portland, OR
Objective: Complex Care Management (CCM) Programs are often used to identify need and service linkage for medical and non-medical services among the Medicaid population. Little is known, however, regarding the impact of CCM Programs on health-related quality of life (HRQL) in Medicaid populations. The aims of this study are: 1) to compare HRQL scores in a Medicaid population enrolled in CCM to national norms by age and gender and 2) to assess the effects of CCM on maintaining or improving HRQL over time.

Study Design: We identified 255 patients enrolled in a Medicaid Health Plan located in the Pacific Northwest that received CCM services. To assess HRQL, the Health Utilities Mark 3 (HUI3) was administered at baseline and at follow-up (4-5.5. months later). HUI3 includes 8 attributes (vision, hearing, speech, ambulation, dexterity, emotion, cognition, pain) with 5 or 6 levels per attribute. Overall HUI3 scores are on a scale in which dead = 0 and perfect health = 1. Differences/changes of 0.03 or more in overall HUI3 scores are regarded as clinically important. Appropriate bivariate statistics were used to compare mean HUI3 scores at baseline and follow-up.

Results: Overall, mean baseline HUI3 scores were 0.19 (SD=0.30), substantially lower than the norm for the US adult population using the age and gender distribution observed in the Medicaid cohort (mean=0.81). Nearly 80% of all respondents reported moderate or severe pain at baseline. Mean HUI3 scores over 4+ months improved from baseline by 0.04 (SD=0.27). Differences between baseline and the 4 month follow-up, however, were not statistically significant, although the 0.04 improvement in overall HUI3 scores is considered to be clinically important.

Conclusions: Overall, we found HRQL to be very low in the observed Medicaid population relative to US norms. We found clinically meaningful improvement in HUI3 scores over time among patients enrolled in a CCM program. Because CCM enrollees were only followed for 4 months, more work is needed to understand better the long-term effects of CCM exposure on HRQL. Such information can be used to design more effective programs to improve and enhance CCM Programs for Medicaid recipients.

Learning Objectives:
1) Describe core components of Complex Care Management (CCM) Programs 2) Describe measurement properties of Quality of Life (QOL) tools such as the Health Utilities Index (HUI) 3) Assess the effectiveness of CCM Programs on QOL Outcomes

Keywords: Disease Management, Quality of Life

Presenting author's disclosure statement:

Any relevant financial relationships? No
Any institutionally-contracted trials related to this submission?

I agree to comply with the American Public Health Association Conflict of Interest and Commercial Support Guidelines, and to disclose to the participants any off-label or experimental uses of a commercial product or service discussed in my presentation.