157916
An innovative response to complex state and federal regulations for school wellness policies
Tuesday, November 6, 2007: 9:10 AM
Amanda Philyaw
,
Fay W. Boozman College of Public Health, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR
Martha M. Phillips, PhD, MPH, MBA
,
Division of Health, Center for Public Health Practice, Arkansas Department of Health & Human Services, Little Rock, AR
Wanda Shockey, MEd, RD, LD
,
Child Nutrition, Arkansas Department of Education, Little Rock, AR
Sheila Brown, MSE, RD, LD
,
Child Nutrition, Arkansas Department of Education, Little Rock, AR
Jada Walker, MEd
,
Fay W. Boozman College of Public Health, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR
James M. Raczynski, PhD
,
Fay W. Boozman College of Public Health, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR
Local education agencies throughout the country face a complicated array of funded and unfunded nutrition and physical activity regulations. As an example, in Arkansas the General Assembly passed Act 1220, state legislation designed to combat child obesity, and improve the health of the next generation of Arkansans by changing state and local nutrition and physical activity policies. Subsequently, the federal government passed the Child Nutrition Reauthorization Act of 2004 mandating that all school districts participating in the federal child nutrition programs (e.g. National School Lunch program) develop and implement a wellness policy. Further, Arkansas public schools were required to incorporate wellness policies into the Arkansas Consolidated School Improvement Plan. To help schools satisfy these various requirements without duplicated effort and documentation, the Arkansas Department of Education (ADE) consolidated the regulations associated with the federal and state laws into a single checklist. The checklist makes it possible for schools and districts to satisfy requirements simultaneously, and, because federal child nutrition program funding is contingent on ADE's approval of the wellness policy as part of the annual agreement between the state agency and local education, they are more likely to comply with other regulations that may not have stringent consequences for noncompliance. This presentation will describe how this process unfolded in Arkansas and highlight this invaluable checklist.
Learning Objectives: 1. Describe how local officials created a tool to assist schools in meeting federal and state regulations regarding child wellness.
2. Understand how invaluable this tool is to schools in the process of developing school wellness policies.
3. Apply the checklist to their states efforts to address child wellness at the local level while complying with federal regulation.
Presenting author's disclosure statement:Any relevant financial relationships? No Any institutionally-contracted trials related to this submission?
I agree to comply with the American Public Health Association Conflict of Interest and Commercial Support Guidelines,
and to disclose to the participants any off-label or experimental uses of a commercial product or service discussed
in my presentation.
|