161433
Evaluating a model approach to community-driven and evidenced based cancer policy development
Tuesday, November 6, 2007: 8:50 AM
Charlotte Lewellen-Williams, DrPH, MPH
,
Center on Community Philanthropy, University of Arkansas Clinton School of Public Service, Little Rock, AR
Glen Mays, PhD, MPH
,
Dept. of Health Policy & Management, College of Public Health, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR
Paul Greene, PhD
,
College of Public Health, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR
Rise Jones, PhD
,
Naomi Morris Center for Assessment and Evaluation, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL
Dianne Rucinski, PhD
,
Naomi Morris Center for Assessment and Evaluation, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL
Ronda Henry-Tillman, MD
,
Winthrop P. Rockefeller Cancer Institute-Cancer Control; Department of Surgery, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR
Chara Stewart, MPH, CHES
,
Winthrop P. Rockefeller Cancer Institute-Cancer Control, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR
BACKGROUND: Traditional policy development relies on organized interest groups and minimizes the role of communities. Minority and underserved communities can contribute to policies for reducing cancer disparities. The Arkansas Cancer Community Network (ARCCN) developed a model for engaging communities with decision makers and researchers in community-focused, evidence-based cancer policy development. Early experiences with the model's implementation were documented. OBJECTIVES: This study profiles the evaluation design for the AR-CCN policy model and presents early findings. METHODS: Assessment of this integrated approach occurs at three levels: advisory, institutional, and community. The evaluation design tracks policy development activities in five domains: 1. Information Dissemination 2. Partnership Building. 3. Policy Assessment 4. Policy Alternatives 5. Program Development. Key process measures are collected using a tool that monitors these and other common elements across all components of ARCCN. Items are categorized according to their proximal, intermediate or distal impact on cancer policy development. A community policy needs assessment was developed to determine local knowledge of policy processes and resources for engagement. FINDINGS: Early findings indicate progress in all five domains with significant movement in information dissemination, partnership building and policy assessment. Findings from the community policy needs assessment suggest that policy awareness is relatively low in most communities but significant resources exist for policy engagement. CONCLUSIONS: The AR-CCN policy model achieved success in stimulating activities that inform cancer policy through the integrated model. Transferability to other health policy issues appears promising. The health impact and sustainability of resulting policies are areas for future study.
Learning Objectives: 1. Understand instruments for evaluating and assessing the process of health policy development.
2. Formulate efficient strategies to track the impact of advisory, institutional and community level involvement in the policy development process.
3. Demonstrate how community based participation enhances evidence-based cancer policy decision making.
Keywords: Policy/Policy Development, Community-Based Partnership
Presenting author's disclosure statement:Any relevant financial relationships? No Any institutionally-contracted trials related to this submission?
I agree to comply with the American Public Health Association Conflict of Interest and Commercial Support Guidelines,
and to disclose to the participants any off-label or experimental uses of a commercial product or service discussed
in my presentation.
|