161493
Improving notifiable disease/condition surveillance through revising state regulations (Chapter 64D-3, Florida Administrative Code)
Richard Hopkins, MD, MSPH
,
Bureau of Epidemiology, Florida Department of Health, Tallahassee, FL
Background: Notifiable disease/condition surveillance is a core public health function codified in state law. Each state has governing notifiable disease/condition reporting regulatory language (statute, administrative code, etc.) that must be reviewed and updated to maintain effective case reporting and surveillance data necessary for public health action. In order to enhance disease reporting, Florida has re-written Chapter 64D-3 Florida Administrative Code, which governs notifiable disease/condition reporting within the state. Methods: Multiple state's notifiable disease/condition laws and mandates were reviewed in order to gather information regarding best-practice language. The re-write of the FL notifiable disease/condition reporting regulations was a collaborative process that included five official public comment periods, as well as topic specific workshops including one with laboratories regarding mandating electronic laboratory reporting. Results: Re-write updates include: (1) High priority disease (anthrax, botulism, etc.) provider reporting time frame changed to require immediate phone reporting upon initial suspicion of diagnosis. As such, laboratories are required to report the receipt of a laboratory test order, as requests for laboratory test identification are considered suspicion of disease. (2) Electronic laboratory reporting is now required. Conclusions: Effectively engaging state and county public health officials as well as public health partners in a collaborative process is essential and challenging. Establishing clear guidelines and laws for notifiable disease/condition surveillance improves compliance.
Learning Objectives: 1. Describe the process of re-writing the Florida notifiable disease/condition reporting regulations, Chapter 64D-3, Florida Administrative Code.
2. Discuss important changes made in the administrative code to enhance notifiable disease/condition reporting in order to assist in timely and effective public health response.
3. Discusses important lessons learned from the process of re-writing the notifiable disease/condition administrative code.
Keywords: Policy/Policy Development, Surveillance
Presenting author's disclosure statement:Any relevant financial relationships? No Any institutionally-contracted trials related to this submission?
I agree to comply with the American Public Health Association Conflict of Interest and Commercial Support Guidelines,
and to disclose to the participants any off-label or experimental uses of a commercial product or service discussed
in my presentation.
|