161588 An Evaluation of Health Beliefs and Participation in the Inclusive Primary Healthcare System (INS) in Guatemala

Wednesday, November 7, 2007

Julie S. Solomon , School of Medicine & Department of Anthropology, Emory University, Atlanta, GA
Alejandro Ceron, MD, MPH , Clinica Maxeña, Suchitepequez, Guatemala
Meredith Fort, MPH, PhC , Department of Health Services, University of Washington, Seattle, WA
Venancia Dionisio , Clinica Maxeña, Suchitepequez, Guatemala
Carol Worthman, PhD , Department of Anthropology, Emory University, Atlanta, GA
The Instancia Nacional de Salud (INS) is a grassroots proposal for an alternative primary healthcare system for Guatemala. Current project implementation is in 40 communities in 2 regions of Guatemala; the present investigation is situated in K'iche' Mayan communities of the Boca Costa de Sololá. The INS approach integrates individual, family, and community health programs ranging in activities from staffed community clinics to social organizing. The participation prevalence for families with young children in the Boca Costa de Sololá coverage area is 87-96%. Why the few remaining households choose not to utilize INS clinic services may illuminate final barriers of access to care, after removing economic, cultural, racial, and linguistic barriers. Initial logistic regression of the census database revealed that after controlling for all other variables (sector, political affiliation as measured by municipal alliance, mother's religion, language spoken, educational level, latrine or boiled water at risk and socioeconomic status) that only distance, head-of-household's religion, and having a child ≤ 5 were predictive of clinic usage in the 1230 families examined. After selecting households with children ≤ 5 in which no member had ever reported a clinic visit, the actual number of non-participant households was 44/1230. Thirty-two households of non-participants, in 5 communities, were successfully interviewed in order to determine their illness explanatory models, impressions of the clinic, staff, and other INS services, and why they chose not to participate. Fifty matched participant “controls” were also interviewed. There was no difference in likelihood, severity, or duration of recent illness among the groups. Nor did use of home remedies, traditional healers, or over-the-counter drugs predict decreased clinic usage. In fact, of the mothers who brought their sick children to the clinic for the current illness, two-thirds used other medicines either before or after the visit, 22% used home remedies, and 17% also went to a traditional healer. The only significant predictors of clinic use, by chi-square, were that mothers in the non-participant group were less likely to fear their child's death and were more likely to be single female heads of household. Further investigation to explain the constraints or liberties of mothers living alone might reveal novel determinants of differential healthcare access.

Learning Objectives:
1. Describe briefly the successes of the INS as an inclusive model of primary health care. 2. Evaluate known risk factors for non-participation in community health clinics by community members who are at risk of disease. 3. Identify potential novel barriers in access to universal health care services.

Keywords: Community Health Programs, Indigenous Populations

Presenting author's disclosure statement:

Any relevant financial relationships? No
Any institutionally-contracted trials related to this submission?

I agree to comply with the American Public Health Association Conflict of Interest and Commercial Support Guidelines, and to disclose to the participants any off-label or experimental uses of a commercial product or service discussed in my presentation.