161715
Analytic and Political Challenges of Using Data to Drive Policymaking in Substance Abuse Prevention in Indiana
Monday, November 5, 2007: 3:15 PM
Eric R. Wright, PhD
,
Center for Health Policy, Department of Public Health, IU School of Medicine, Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis, Indianapolis, IN
Harold Kooreman, MA
,
IU Center for Health Policy, Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis, Indianapolis, IN
Marcia French, MSW
,
Division of Mental Health and Addiction, Indiana Family and Social Services Administration, Indianapolis, IN
Kim Manlove, PhD
,
Division of Mental Health and Addiction, Indiana Family and Social Services Administration, Indianapolis, IN
In July 2005, Indiana's Office of the Governor received a grant from the U. S. Department of Health and Human Services' Center for Substance Abuse Prevention (CSAP) as part of its Strategic Prevention Framework State Incentive Grant (SPF-SIG) Program. The SPF SIG program required that Indiana create a State Epidemiological Outcomes Workgroup (SEOW) whose task was to collect and analyze available epidemiological data with the goal of helping state agencies make data-based decisions regarding substance abuse prevention. In order to meet the program requirements, state agencies involved in substance abuse prevention appointed representatives to serve on the SEOW. In an effort to balance tensions among the different state agencies, the Governor asked Dr. Eric Wright, Director of the Center for Health Policy at Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis (IUPUI) to chair the SEOW and to carry out the required data analysis with assistance from professional staff at IUPUI. In addition to a state epidemiological profile describing patterns of substance use and abuse in Indiana, the SEOW used the data collected to identify six prevention priorities to guide state policymaking and the allocation of prevention funding. In this paper, we provide a brief overview of the key findings from the SEOW's work and discuss the research and political process involved in the development and application of the identified priorities. We conclude suggesting that the strategy employed in Indiana illustrates the potential practical and political value of a close government-academic collaboration to facilitate data-driven decision making and overcoming political silos within state government.
Learning Objectives: 1. Describe the benefits of developing a government-academic collaboration
2. Articulate how data from multiple sources can be combined to make decisions about substance abuse prevention needs.
3. Discuss how factors such as level of resources, existence of effective interventions, and political will affect the acceptance of data-based decisions.
Keywords: Substance Abuse Prevention, Policy/Policy Development
Presenting author's disclosure statement:Any relevant financial relationships? No Any institutionally-contracted trials related to this submission?
I agree to comply with the American Public Health Association Conflict of Interest and Commercial Support Guidelines,
and to disclose to the participants any off-label or experimental uses of a commercial product or service discussed
in my presentation.
|