161786 Critical Components of Using a Systems Approach to Effect Environmental Asthma Policies and Reduce Health Disparities: An Evaluation of the Community Action to Fight Asthma Initiative in California

Tuesday, November 6, 2007: 5:30 PM

Mary Kreger, Dr PH , Philip R. Lee Institute for Health Policy Studies, UCSF, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
Claire Brindis, DrPH , Philip R. Lee Institute for Health Policy Studies, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
Dana Hughes, DrPH , Institute for Health Policy Studies, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
Diane Manuel, PhD, MBA , The California Endowment, Los Angeles, CA
Diana Lee , National Community Development Institute, Oakland, CA
Annalisa Robles, MPA , The California Endowment, Los Angeles, CA
Marion Standish, JDL , Greater Bay Area Regional Office, The California Endowment, Oakland, CA
Rebecca Dorman, MPH , Institute for Health Policy Studies, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
Lauren Sassoubre, BA , Institute for Health Policy Studies, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
Purpose: The Community Action to Fight Asthma Initiative, which funds statewide local coalitions and technical assistance providers (now in its fifth year of funding), is employed as an example of using a systems approach to change environmental asthma policies. Critical systems change concepts are presented for communities to use in planning and implementing policies.

The Evaluation included • Outcome measures for policy formulation and implementation, • Policymaker surveys, • Media Usage, • Qualitative and quantitative data. Policy outcomes were categorized into: • Indoor air quality in schools, • Indoor air quality in homes, • Outdoor air quality.

Systems change concepts and examples are discussed for community, regional, and statewide use to affect policy changes. These include: Designing synergistic systems aligning values, activities, and relationships; Developing collaborative planning and consensus building; Creating capacity using education, refining assumptions, and using data; Creating leaders, advocates, and champions; Employing communication strategies to enhance capacity and leadership development; Designing change efforts that are sensitive to community cultural and environmental factors; Instituting and reinforcing appropriate feedback loops; Assessing positive and negative unanticipated consequences; Addressing root causes of problems; Designing changes at appropriate systems levels; Addressing relevant interrelationships; Leveraging resources for sustainable funding; Shifting power among stakeholders.

Conclusion: Employing systems change concepts to evaluate this type of community-oriented environmental policy initiative provides valuable tools and feedback to the participants and the funder (The California Endowment). Using these methods can facilitate effective policies and outcomes.

Learning Objectives:
At the conclusion of the session, the participant will be able to define and discuss the types of systems change concepts that are important for communities to use in planning and implementing the prevention principles related to environmental (and other) policies.

Keywords: Community-Based Partnership, Change Concepts

Presenting author's disclosure statement:

Any relevant financial relationships? No
Any institutionally-contracted trials related to this submission?

I agree to comply with the American Public Health Association Conflict of Interest and Commercial Support Guidelines, and to disclose to the participants any off-label or experimental uses of a commercial product or service discussed in my presentation.