162509 A systematic approach for program evaluation: National evaluation of the National Cancer Institute Community Networks Program

Monday, November 5, 2007: 8:50 AM

Gabriella M. Newes-Adeyi, PhD, MPH , Domestic Health Division, Abt Associates Inc., Bethesda, MD
Nekisha E. Lakins, MA , CSR, Incorporated, Arlington, VA
Emmanuel A. Taylor, MSc, DrPH , Center to Reduce Cancer Health Disparities (CRCHD), National Cancer Institute (NCI), Rockville, MD
Kenneth C. Chu, PhD , Center to Reduce Cancer Health Disparities (CRCHD), National Cancer Institute (NCI), Rockville, MD
Leslie Cooper, PhD, MPH, BSN, RN , Division of Research Infrastructure, National Center for Research Resources, Bethesda, MD
In 2005, the National Cancer Institute Center to Reduce Cancer Health Disparities launched the Community Networks Program to Reduce Cancer Health Disparities through Education, Research, and Training (CNP). The goals of the 5-year CNP are to significantly increase access to and utilization of beneficial cancer interventions in communities with cancer health disparities and to provide a cadre of well-trained researchers who will continue to reduce disparities in communities. Framed by the community-based participatory research (CBPR) approach, 25 awardee institutions across the U.S. have implemented a variety of strategies to help reduce disparities in cancer awareness, prevention and screening. The CNP is implemented in three overlapping phases, with each phase continuing through the end of the program once initiated. The national evaluation of the CNP employs a multi-step process to assess the implementation and effectiveness of the program across its three phases. Participatory techniques are utilized to obtain input from the CNP grantees into the conceptualization and development of data collection strategies. A separate logic model developed for each program phase serves as the basis for development of the data collection tools. Each model links the phase-specific program objectives to activities, outputs and outcomes. Antecedent and contextual variables are also accounted for. This presentation will examine the process of developing and implementing the CNP national evaluation, with a focus on describing the collaborative process and the evaluation feedback loop to inform program improvement. Findings from Phase I and II data collection to date also will briefly be presented.

Learning Objectives:
By the end of this presentation, participants will be able to: 1)Identify steps in developing logic models to guide evaluation of community-based participatory programs; 2)List lessons learned from collaborative evaluation development; 3)Describe key findings from the CNP evaluation to date.

Keywords: Cancer, Evaluation

Presenting author's disclosure statement:

Any relevant financial relationships? No
Any institutionally-contracted trials related to this submission?

I agree to comply with the American Public Health Association Conflict of Interest and Commercial Support Guidelines, and to disclose to the participants any off-label or experimental uses of a commercial product or service discussed in my presentation.