163543 Disparities in HIV prevention interventions for youth: What about the needs of gay youth?

Monday, November 5, 2007

Gary W. Harper, PhD, MPH , Psychology, DePaul University, Chicago, IL
Andrew J. Riplinger, BS , Psychology, DePaul University, Chicago, IL
Marco A. Hidalgo, BA , Psychology, DePaul University, Chicago, IL
Jessica L. Gehle, BS , Psychology, DePaul University, Chicago, IL
Omar B. Jamil, MA , Psychology, DePaul University, Chicago, IL
Background: The HIV pandemic among youth in the United States is increasingly impacting young gay/bisexual/questioning [GBQ] males, especially youth of color. CDC data between 2000 and 2004 reveal increasing numbers of males living with HIV for both adolescents (13-19 years: 39% male in 2000; 61% male in 2004) and young adults (20-24 years: 55% male in 2000; 70% male in 2004). The vast majority of these males were infected through sex with males. Despite this rapid increase in HIV infection among male youth, there has not been a commensurate increase in HIV prevention programs focused on GBQ youth.

Methods: This presentation will present data from a content analysis of journal articles published between 1996 and 2006 that report findings from evaluations of HIV primary prevention programs for youth ages 12-25.

Results: Comparisons of interventions that did and did not include GBQ male youth will be presented, with a focus on characteristics of the target populations (e.g., age, ethnicity), interventions (e.g., methods, content), and evaluations (e.g., design, measures). Results reveal disproportionately few HIV prevention interventions for GBQ youth, as well as limited complexity and diversity in existing intervention components.

Conclusions: Possible explanations for this disparity include discriminatory public policies that limit funding for LGBT public health research/interventions, discomfort by some public health professionals with LGBT issues, and fears of discrimination for conducting LGBT research/interventions experienced by some LGBT-identified public health professionals. Changes in public policies and social climate are needed to encourage increased focus on HIV prevention interventions for GBQ youth.

Learning Objectives:
1. Articulate changes in HIV infection rates by gender and mode of transmission for adolescents and young adults in the U.S. between 2000 and 2004. 2. List three characteristics that differentiate HIV prevention programs for youth that have been developed to address the needs of gay/bisexual/questioning (GBQ) youth from those programs that do not address the needs of GBQ youth. 3. List three potential reasons why there are disproportionately few HIV prevention programs that have been developed/evaluated specifically for GBQ youth.

Keywords: HIV Interventions, Adolescent Health

Presenting author's disclosure statement:

Any relevant financial relationships? No
Any institutionally-contracted trials related to this submission?

I agree to comply with the American Public Health Association Conflict of Interest and Commercial Support Guidelines, and to disclose to the participants any off-label or experimental uses of a commercial product or service discussed in my presentation.