170362 Public perception and behavior change in relationship to hot weather and air pollution

Monday, October 27, 2008

Jan C. Semenza, PhD, MPH, MS , Unit of Scientific Advice, European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC), Stockholm, Sweden
Daniel J. Wilson Wilson, MS , Mountain Measurement, Portland, OR
Jeremy Parra, MS , Environmental Science, Portland State University, Portland, OR
Brian D. Bontempo, PhD , Mountain Measurement, Portland, OR
Melissa Hart, PhD , Portland State University, Portland, OR
David J. Sailor, PhD , Mechanical and Materials Engineering, Portland State University, Portland, OR
Linda A. George, PhD , Environmental Sciences and Resources, Portland State University, Portland, OR
Background. Changes in climate systems are increasing heat wave frequency and air stagnation, both conditions associated with exacerbating poor air quality and of considerable public health concern.

Objectives. Heat and air pollution advisory systems are in place in many cities for early detection and response to reduce health consequences, or severity of adverse conditions. Whereas the ability to forecast heat waves and/or air pollution episodes has become increasingly sophisticated and accurate, little is known about the effectiveness of advisories in altering public behavior.

Methods. Air quality and meteorological conditions were measured during advisory and control days in Portland OR and Houston TX in 2005 and 2006 and 1962 subjects were interviewed by telephone about their perception and response to these conditions.

Results. Elevated ambient temperatures were accurately recognized regardless of air-conditioning use; in Portland, respondents resorted to active cooling behavior (A/C, fan, etc), while in Houston no such change was observed. More heat-related symptoms were reported in Portland compared to Houston, probably due to low air conditioning use in the northwest. One third of study participants were aware of air quality advisories but only ~ 10-15 % claimed to have changed activities during such an episode. Not the advisory, however, drove their behavior change, but rather the perception of poor air quality, which was not related to PM2.5 or ozone measurements.

Conclusions. Messages are not reaching the public during potentially hazardous weather and air quality conditions. Climatic forecasts are increasingly predictive but public agencies fail to mount appropriate outreach responses.

Learning Objectives:
1) Describe heat and air pollution advisory systems of US cities. 2) Discuss the impact of heat and air pollution advisory systems on the public. 3) Articulate the reasons why messages are not reaching the public during potentially hazardous weather and air quality conditions

Keywords: Environmental Health, Environmental Exposures

Presenting author's disclosure statement:

Qualified on the content I am responsible for because: I have no conflict of interst
Any relevant financial relationships? No

I agree to comply with the American Public Health Association Conflict of Interest and Commercial Support Guidelines, and to disclose to the participants any off-label or experimental uses of a commercial product or service discussed in my presentation.