170860
Age-based disparities in clinical trials: Barriers and multi-level policy solutions
Angelica P. Herrera, DrPH
,
Center for Research on Minority Health, Department of Health Disparities, U.T. M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
Daniel Goldberg, JD, PhDc
,
Chronic Disease Prevention and Control Research Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX
Denae King, PhD
,
Department of Health Disparities Research, Center for Research on Minority Health, The University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
Larry E. Laufman, EdD
,
Chronic Disease Prevention and Control Research Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX
Shedra Amy Snipes, PhD
,
Center for Research on Minority Health, Department of Health Disparities, U.T. M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
Cindy Spiker, MPH
,
Chronic Disease Prevention and Control Research Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX
Isabel Torres Vigil, DrPH
,
Center for Research on Minority Health, Department of Health Disparities, U.T. M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
Armin Weinberg, PhD
,
Chronic Disease Prevention and Control Research Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX
Background: Clinical trials offer important therapeutic options and test the safety and efficacy of new treatments. Equal access to clinical trials by diverse populations ensures a treatment's generalizability or limitations. Older adults are vastly underrepresented in clinical trials in spite of suffering the greatest burden of ill health, spending 36% of total personal healthcare dollars, and consuming 34% of all prescriptions. Objectives: We reviewed older adults' and minority elders' individual, community, and system-level barriers to clinical trial participation, identified weaknesses in existing health policies, and explored opportunities for policy-driven change to increase elders' clinical trial participation and retention. Methods: The Policy Research arm of the Eliminating Disparities in Clinical Trials (EDICT) initiative has nine cross-disciplinary teams of policy experts, federal agents, community advocates, academics, and clinical researchers. The teams convene at national meetings and ongoing Web-based teleconferences to devise practical solutions to clinical trial disparities across racial/ethnic, gender, and age groups. Results: The EDICT project has winnowed and deliberated over policies that address: (a) study design modifications and clinical trial eligibility criteria, (b) age-friendly approaches to health illiteracy and seniors' social support needs, (c) the FDA's Guidance for the Industry and geriatric use labeling, (d) NIH oversight, monitoring, and enforcement, (e) the ethics of informed consent with cognitively impaired older adults, (f) Medicare coverage of clinical trials, and (g) requirements in medical and pharmacy education to reduce ageism. Conclusion: The proposed policy changes offer promising solutions to significantly diminish age-based disparities in clinical trials at multiple levels.
Learning Objectives: 1. Evaluate gaps in health policy initiatives for older adults’ participation in clinical trials.
2. Identify barriers to older adults’ participation in clinical trials.
3. Describe the role of federal agencies, the pharmaceutical industry, and non-profit funders in attenuating the underrepresentation of older adults in clinical trials.
4. Discuss the feasibility of and potential consequences to proposed policy solutions.
Keywords: Clinical Trials, Aging
Presenting author's disclosure statement:Qualified on the content I am responsible for because: fellow conducting research in health policy, aging, and clinical trials.
Any relevant financial relationships? No
I agree to comply with the American Public Health Association Conflict of Interest and Commercial Support Guidelines,
and to disclose to the participants any off-label or experimental uses of a commercial product or service discussed
in my presentation.
|